Davos 1929: “What is man?” The disagreement between Cassirer and Heidegger. Philosophical and political reasons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/rif.17.2020.29712Keywords:
Kant, Husserl, universality, freedom, language, republican constitution, infinity, plurality, Cassirer, HeideggerAbstract
My essay wanted to explain genealogically and in a contextualized way the disagreement between Cassirer and Heidegger in Davos, and its drift towards Nazism from the budgets of their existential philosophy. What role does spiritual anti-Semitism play in the Heideggerian critique of neo-Kantianism and transcendental phenomenology? Why is Husserl's phenomenology «a monstrosity»? Why does Kant become the battle and battlefield of the Kulturkampf? Why do you read Heidegger as you read? What is the meaning of the practice of the history of philosophy in the “final” of philosophy?
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Reconocimiento (by): Se permite cualquier explotación de la obra, incluyendo una finalidad comercial, así como la creación de obras derivadas, la distribución de las cuales también está permitida sin ninguna restricción.
