Davos 1929: “What is man?” The disagreement between Cassirer and Heidegger. Philosophical and political reasons

Authors

  • Julio Quesada Universidad Veracruzana, Instituto de Filosofía

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/rif.17.2020.29712

Keywords:

Kant, Husserl, universality, freedom, language, republican constitution, infinity, plurality, Cassirer, Heidegger

Abstract

My essay wanted to explain genealogically and in a contextualized way the disagreement between Cassirer and Heidegger in Davos, and its drift towards Nazism from the budgets of their existential philosophy. What role does spiritual anti-Semitism play in the Heideggerian critique of neo-Kantianism and transcendental phenomenology? Why is Husserl's phenomenology «a monstrosity»? Why does Kant become the battle and battlefield of the Kulturkampf? Why do you read Heidegger as you read? What is the meaning of the practice of the history of philosophy in the “final” of philosophy?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Husserl, Heidegger y Ricoeur, el año de la pandemia

Downloads

Published

2021-02-08

How to Cite

Quesada, J. (2021). Davos 1929: “What is man?” The disagreement between Cassirer and Heidegger. Philosophical and political reasons. Investigaciones Fenomenológicas, (17), 177–218. https://doi.org/10.5944/rif.17.2020.29712

Issue

No. 17 (2020)

Section

Artículos