¿Prevalece el caos? Reflexiones sobre el eclecticismo técnico y la integración asimilativa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v10i10.939Palabras clave:
integración asimilativa, ecleticismo técnicoResumen
Lazarus sostiene que los esfuerzos de integración de las psicoterapias a nivel teórico han fomentado una desafortunada proliferación de enfoques que rivalizan entre ellos, similar a la que ya existía entre las escuelas de psicoterapia no-integradoras tradicionales. Messer considera que este florecimiento de teorías integradoras es inevitable, e incluso deseable, y es consistente con una visión construccionista social de la realidad. Lazarus aboga por el eclecticismo técnico, regido más por observaciones que por teorías, como alternativa a la integración teórica. Este autor considera útil aprovechar técnicas validadas en distintos marcos de referencia. Messer argumenta que las observaciones están cargadas necesariamente de contenido teórico, y que las técnicas importadas de otras escuelas de terapia son asimiladas y modificadas por el nuevo contexto clínico y teórico en que son empleadas, por lo que debieran ser validadas de nuevo.
Descargas
Citas
ARKOWITZ, H. (1989). The role of theory in psychotherapy integration. Journal of Integrative and Eclectic
Psychotherapy, 8, 8-16.
ARLOW, J.A. (1989). Psychoanalysis. In R.J. Corsini & D. Wedding (Eds.), Current psychotherapies (Ah ed; p.
-62). Hasca, H: Peacock).
BANDURA, A. (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
BEITMAN, B.D. (1989). Why lam an integrationist (Not aneclectic). British Journal of Guidance and Counseling,
, 259-273.
BEUTLER, L.E. (1986). Systematic eclectic psychotherapy. In J.C. Norcross (Ed.), Handbook of eclectic
psychotherapy (pp 94-131). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
COLBY, K.M. (1964). Psychotherapeutic procesess. Annual Review of Psychology, 15, 347-370.
DALLENBACH, K.M. (1963). Phrenology versus psychoanalysis. In $.J. Rachman (Ed.), Critical essays on
psychoanalysis (pp 267-284). New York: Pergamon Press.
DRISCOLL, R. (1987). Ordinary language as common language for psychotherapy. Journal of Integrative and
Eclectic Psychotherapy, 6, 184-194.
DRYDEN, W. (1986). Eclectic psychotherapies: A critigue of leading approaches. In J.C. Norcross (Ed.).
Handbook of eclectic psychotherapies (pp. 353-375). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
EYSENCK, H.J. (1986). Consensus and controversy: Two types of science. In $. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Hans
Eysenck: Consensus and controversy. (pp 375-398). London: Palmer.
FRANS, C.M. (1984). On conceptual and technical integrity in psychoanalysis and behavior therapy: Two
fundamentally incompatible systems. In H. Arkowitz & S.B. Messer (Eds.), Psychoanalytic therapy and
behavior therapy: Is integration possible? (pp 223-247). New York: Plenum.
GERGEN, KJ. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag.
GREENBERG, L.S. (1984). A task analysis of intrapersonal conflict resolution. In L.N. Rice & L.S. Greenberg
(eds.), Patterns of change (pp. 671-123). New York: Guilford Press.
GOLDFERIED, M.R. (1980). Toward the delineation of therapeutic change principles. American Psychologist, 35,
-999.
HEISENBERG, W. (1971). Physics and beyond: Encounters and conversations. New York: Harper & Row.
KARASU, T.B. (1986). The specificity versus nonspecificity dilemma: Toward identifying therapeutic change
agents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 687-695.
KOCH, $S. (1981). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge. Lessons of a century gua “Science”.
American Psychologist, 36, 257-269.
LAZARUS, A.A. (1988). Eclecticism in behavior therapy. In P.M.G. Emmelkamp, W.T.A.M. Everard, F.
Kaaimaat, & M.J.M. van Son (eds.), Advances in theory and practice in behavior therapy. Amsterdam:
Swets & Zeitlinger.
LAZARUS A.A. (198%). Why 1 am eclectic (Not an integrationist). British Journal of Guidance and Counseling,
, 248-258.
LAZARUS, A.A. (1989b). The practice of multimodal therapy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
LAZARUS, A.A. (1989). Multimodal therapy. In R. Corsini& D. Wedding (Eds.), Current psychotherapies (th
edition) (pp 502-544). Ttasca, IL: Peacock.
LONDON, P. (The modes and morals of psychotherapy. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
LONDON, P. (1988). Metamorphosis in psychotherapy: Slouching toward integration. Journal of Integrative and
Eclectic Psychotherapy, 7, 3-12.
MAHONEY, M.J. (1989). Scientific psychology and radical behaviorism. American Psychologist, 44, 1261-1272.
MOULTRUP, D. (1986). Integration: A coming of age. Contemporary Family Therapy, 8, 157-167.
MAHRER, A.R. (1989). The integration of psychotherapies: A guide for practicing therapists. New York: Human
Sciences Press.
MESSER, $.B. (1986). Behavioral and psychoanalytic perspectives at therapeutic choice points. American
Psychologist, d1, 1261-1272.
MESSER, $.B. (1987). Can the tower of Babel be completed? A critigue of the common language proposal. Journal
of Integrative and Eclectic Psychotherapy, 6, 195-199.
MESSER, S.B., SASS, LA, & WOOLFOLK, R.L. (Eds.) (1988). Hermeneutics and psychological theory:
Interpretative perspectives on personality, psychotherapy and psychopathology. New Brunswick, NS:
Rutgers University Press.
MESSER, $.B. & WINOKUR, M. (1981). Therapeutic change principles: Are commonalities more apparent then
real? American Psychologist, 36, 1547-1548.
MOSAK, H.H. (1989). Adlerian psychotherapy. In R.J. Corsini & D. Wedding (Eds.), Current psychotherapies
(4th edition). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
NORCROSS, J.C. (1983). In defense of theoretical orientations for clinicians. The Clinical Psychologist, Winter,
-17.
NORCROSS, J.C. (1986). (Ed.) Handbook of eclectic psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel. NORCROSS, J.C. (1987). Special selection: Toward acommon language for psychotherapy. Journal of Integrative
and Eclectic Psychotherapy, 4, 165-205.
NORCROSS, J.C. (1990). Commentary: Eclecticismmisrepresented and integration misunderstood. Psychotherapy, 27, 297-300. s
NORCROSS, J.C. & NAPOLITANO, G. (1986). Defining our journal and ourselves. /uternational Journal of
Eclectc Psychotherapy, 5, 249-255.
NORCROSS, J.C. & GRENCAVAGE, L.M. (1989). Eclecticism and integration in counselling psychotherapy:
Major themes and obstacles. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 17, 221-241.
NORCROSS, J.C. &PROCHASKA,1.O. (1988). A study of eclectic (and integrative) viewsrevisited. Professional
Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 170-174.
PATTERSON, C.H. (1989). Eclecticism jn psychotherapy: Is integration posible? Psychotherapy, 26, 157-161.
PEPPER, $.P. (1942). World hypothesis: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of Califomia Press.
POLKINGHORNE, D. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
PROCHASKA, JO. & DiCLEMENTE, C.C (1984). The trans-theoretical approach: Crossing the traditional
boundaries of therapy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irvin.
SALTZMAN, N. & NORCROSS, J.C. (1990). (Eds.), Therapy wars: Contention and convergence in differing
clinical approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
STRUPP, H.H. (1989). Psychotherapy: Can the practicioner leam from the researcher? American Psychologist, 44,
-724, .
WATCHEL, P.L. (1977). Psychoanalysis and behavior therapy: Toward an integration. New York: Basic Books.
WACHTEL, P.L. (1984). On theory, practice, and the nature of integration. In H Arkowitz & $.B. Messer (Eds.),
Psychoanalytic therapy and behavior therapy: ls integration possible? (pp 31-52). New York: Plenum.
WOOLFOLK, R.L.,SASS,L.A.& MESSER, S.B. (1988). Introduction to hermeneutics. In $.B. Messer,L.A. Sass
& R.L. Woolfolk (Eds.), Hermeneuticsand psychological theory: Interpretative perspectives on personality,
psychotherapy and psychopathology (pp 2-26). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
YONTEF, G.M. & SIMKIN, J.S. (1989). Gestalt therapy. In R.J. Corsini & D. Wedding (Eds.), Current
psychotherapies (Ah ed.) (pp 323-362). Ttasca, IL: Peacock.
