¿Prevalece el caos? Reflexiones sobre el eclecticismo técnico y la integración asimilativa

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v10i10.939

Keywords:

technical eclecticism, assimilative integration

Abstract

Lazarus contends that efforts to integrate psychotherapy at the theoretical level have fostered the same unfortunate profusion of competing approaches associated with nonintegrative traditional schools of psychotherapy. Messer views this flowering of integrative theories as unavoidable, even desirable, and as consistent with a social constructionist view of reality. As an alternative to theoretical integration, Lazarus advocates technical eclecticism, which he considers to be governed by observations rather than theories, and as such, draws freely upon techniques validated within other frameworks. Messer argues that such observations are necessarily theory laden, and that techniques imported from other therapies are colored by, and assimilated within, the new clinical and theoretical context in which they are employed, and therefore must be validated anew.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARKOWITZ, H. (1989). The role of theory in psychotherapy integration. Journal of Integrative and Eclectic

Psychotherapy, 8, 8-16.

ARLOW, J.A. (1989). Psychoanalysis. In R.J. Corsini & D. Wedding (Eds.), Current psychotherapies (Ah ed; p.

-62). Hasca, H: Peacock).

BANDURA, A. (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

BEITMAN, B.D. (1989). Why lam an integrationist (Not aneclectic). British Journal of Guidance and Counseling,

, 259-273.

BEUTLER, L.E. (1986). Systematic eclectic psychotherapy. In J.C. Norcross (Ed.), Handbook of eclectic

psychotherapy (pp 94-131). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

COLBY, K.M. (1964). Psychotherapeutic procesess. Annual Review of Psychology, 15, 347-370.

DALLENBACH, K.M. (1963). Phrenology versus psychoanalysis. In $.J. Rachman (Ed.), Critical essays on

psychoanalysis (pp 267-284). New York: Pergamon Press.

DRISCOLL, R. (1987). Ordinary language as common language for psychotherapy. Journal of Integrative and

Eclectic Psychotherapy, 6, 184-194.

DRYDEN, W. (1986). Eclectic psychotherapies: A critigue of leading approaches. In J.C. Norcross (Ed.).

Handbook of eclectic psychotherapies (pp. 353-375). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

EYSENCK, H.J. (1986). Consensus and controversy: Two types of science. In $. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Hans

Eysenck: Consensus and controversy. (pp 375-398). London: Palmer.

FRANS, C.M. (1984). On conceptual and technical integrity in psychoanalysis and behavior therapy: Two

fundamentally incompatible systems. In H. Arkowitz & S.B. Messer (Eds.), Psychoanalytic therapy and

behavior therapy: Is integration possible? (pp 223-247). New York: Plenum.

GERGEN, KJ. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag.

GREENBERG, L.S. (1984). A task analysis of intrapersonal conflict resolution. In L.N. Rice & L.S. Greenberg

(eds.), Patterns of change (pp. 671-123). New York: Guilford Press.

GOLDFERIED, M.R. (1980). Toward the delineation of therapeutic change principles. American Psychologist, 35,

-999.

HEISENBERG, W. (1971). Physics and beyond: Encounters and conversations. New York: Harper & Row.

KARASU, T.B. (1986). The specificity versus nonspecificity dilemma: Toward identifying therapeutic change

agents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 687-695.

KOCH, $S. (1981). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge. Lessons of a century gua “Science”.

American Psychologist, 36, 257-269.

LAZARUS, A.A. (1988). Eclecticism in behavior therapy. In P.M.G. Emmelkamp, W.T.A.M. Everard, F.

Kaaimaat, & M.J.M. van Son (eds.), Advances in theory and practice in behavior therapy. Amsterdam:

Swets & Zeitlinger.

LAZARUS A.A. (198%). Why 1 am eclectic (Not an integrationist). British Journal of Guidance and Counseling,

, 248-258.

LAZARUS, A.A. (1989b). The practice of multimodal therapy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

LAZARUS, A.A. (1989). Multimodal therapy. In R. Corsini& D. Wedding (Eds.), Current psychotherapies (th

edition) (pp 502-544). Ttasca, IL: Peacock.

LONDON, P. (The modes and morals of psychotherapy. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

LONDON, P. (1988). Metamorphosis in psychotherapy: Slouching toward integration. Journal of Integrative and

Eclectic Psychotherapy, 7, 3-12.

MAHONEY, M.J. (1989). Scientific psychology and radical behaviorism. American Psychologist, 44, 1261-1272.

MOULTRUP, D. (1986). Integration: A coming of age. Contemporary Family Therapy, 8, 157-167.

MAHRER, A.R. (1989). The integration of psychotherapies: A guide for practicing therapists. New York: Human

Sciences Press.

MESSER, $.B. (1986). Behavioral and psychoanalytic perspectives at therapeutic choice points. American

Psychologist, d1, 1261-1272.

MESSER, $.B. (1987). Can the tower of Babel be completed? A critigue of the common language proposal. Journal

of Integrative and Eclectic Psychotherapy, 6, 195-199.

MESSER, S.B., SASS, LA, & WOOLFOLK, R.L. (Eds.) (1988). Hermeneutics and psychological theory:

Interpretative perspectives on personality, psychotherapy and psychopathology. New Brunswick, NS:

Rutgers University Press.

MESSER, $.B. & WINOKUR, M. (1981). Therapeutic change principles: Are commonalities more apparent then

real? American Psychologist, 36, 1547-1548.

MOSAK, H.H. (1989). Adlerian psychotherapy. In R.J. Corsini & D. Wedding (Eds.), Current psychotherapies

(4th edition). Itasca, IL: Peacock.

NORCROSS, J.C. (1983). In defense of theoretical orientations for clinicians. The Clinical Psychologist, Winter,

-17.

NORCROSS, J.C. (1986). (Ed.) Handbook of eclectic psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel. NORCROSS, J.C. (1987). Special selection: Toward acommon language for psychotherapy. Journal of Integrative

and Eclectic Psychotherapy, 4, 165-205.

NORCROSS, J.C. (1990). Commentary: Eclecticismmisrepresented and integration misunderstood. Psychotherapy, 27, 297-300. s

NORCROSS, J.C. & NAPOLITANO, G. (1986). Defining our journal and ourselves. /uternational Journal of

Eclectc Psychotherapy, 5, 249-255.

NORCROSS, J.C. & GRENCAVAGE, L.M. (1989). Eclecticism and integration in counselling psychotherapy:

Major themes and obstacles. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 17, 221-241.

NORCROSS, J.C. &PROCHASKA,1.O. (1988). A study of eclectic (and integrative) viewsrevisited. Professional

Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 170-174.

PATTERSON, C.H. (1989). Eclecticism jn psychotherapy: Is integration posible? Psychotherapy, 26, 157-161.

PEPPER, $.P. (1942). World hypothesis: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of Califomia Press.

POLKINGHORNE, D. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

PROCHASKA, JO. & DiCLEMENTE, C.C (1984). The trans-theoretical approach: Crossing the traditional

boundaries of therapy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irvin.

SALTZMAN, N. & NORCROSS, J.C. (1990). (Eds.), Therapy wars: Contention and convergence in differing

clinical approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

STRUPP, H.H. (1989). Psychotherapy: Can the practicioner leam from the researcher? American Psychologist, 44,

-724, .

WATCHEL, P.L. (1977). Psychoanalysis and behavior therapy: Toward an integration. New York: Basic Books.

WACHTEL, P.L. (1984). On theory, practice, and the nature of integration. In H Arkowitz & $.B. Messer (Eds.),

Psychoanalytic therapy and behavior therapy: ls integration possible? (pp 31-52). New York: Plenum.

WOOLFOLK, R.L.,SASS,L.A.& MESSER, S.B. (1988). Introduction to hermeneutics. In $.B. Messer,L.A. Sass

& R.L. Woolfolk (Eds.), Hermeneuticsand psychological theory: Interpretative perspectives on personality,

psychotherapy and psychopathology (pp 2-26). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

YONTEF, G.M. & SIMKIN, J.S. (1989). Gestalt therapy. In R.J. Corsini & D. Wedding (Eds.), Current

psychotherapies (Ah ed.) (pp 323-362). Ttasca, IL: Peacock.

Published

1992-07-01

How to Cite

Lazarus, A., & Messer, S. B. (1992). ¿Prevalece el caos? Reflexiones sobre el eclecticismo técnico y la integración asimilativa. Revista de Psicoterapia, 3(10/11), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v10i10.939

Issue

Section

Monographic Articles