Inteligencia artificial y confianza a través de una comunicación científica comprensible: un compromiso ético con la ciudadanía
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.50.2022.32795Keywords:
explainability , science, communicationAbstract
The enormous potential of the development of artificial intelligence (AI) can be seen in an increase in its presence in various environments to offer support in activities that stand out for a high level of complexity. In this sense, institutions such as the European Commission (EC) warn of the need to promote a cultivation of trust in AI to guarantee governance that places the human being at the center of its concerns and benefits. A culture that implies a engagement to strengthening the communication skills of scientific experts as a strategy to promote citizen understanding and participation. A scientific communication concerned with the ethical principle of explainability implies valuing interaction with citizens to recognize their testimonies and life experiences, incorporating them into research and innovation processes.
Downloads
References
BIMBER, B.A. (1996). The politics of expertise in congress: The rise and fall of the office of technology assessment, Albany: State University of New York Press.
BODEN, M. A. (2017). Inteligencia Artificial, Madrid: Turner Noema.
BROKS, P. (2006). Understanding Popular Science, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
COMISIÓN EUROPEA (2015). Portal Horizonte 2020. Extraído el 24 de enero de 2022 desde https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation#Article
COMISIÓN EUROPEA (2018). Artificial intelligence: Commission kicks off work on marrying cutting-edge technology and ethical standards. Extraído el 24 de enero de 2022 desde https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_1381
COMISIÓN EUROPEA (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworty AI. Extraído el 24 de enero de 2022 desde https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
COMISIÓN EUROPEA (2020). Libro Blanco sobre la inteligencia artificial: un enfoque europeo orientado a la excelencia y la confianza. Extraído el 24 de enero de 2022 desde https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence-european-approach-excellence-and-trust_en
DOMINGO MORATALLA, A. (2021). Del hombre carnal al hombre digital: vitaminas para una ciudadanía digital, España: TEELL Editorial.
EGE-EUROPEAN GROUP ON ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES (2018). Statement on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and “Autonomous” Systems, Comisión Europea, Dirección General de Investigación e Innovación. Extraído el 24 de enero de 2022 desde https://ec.europa.eu/research/ege/pdf/ege_ai_statement_2018.pdf.
ESTLAMI, M., RICKMAN, A., VACCARO, K., ALEYASEN, A., VUONG, A., KARAHALIOS, K., HAMILTON, K. y SANDVIG, C. (2015). En Association for Computing Machinery, Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp.153–162). New York: ACM.
FISHER, E. y RIP, A. (2013). Responsible Innovation: Multi-Level Dynamics and Soft Intervention Practices. En R. Owen, J. Bessant y M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 165-183). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
FLORIDI, L., COWLS, J., BELTRAMETTI, M., CHATILA, R., CHAZERAND, P., DIGNUM, V., LUETGE, C., MADELIN, R., PAGALLO, U., ROSSI, F., SCHAFER, B., VALCKE, P. y VAYENA, E. (2018). “AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations”. Minds and Machines, 28, 689-707.
Geoghegan-Quinn, M. (2012). Commissioner Geoghegan-Quinn Keynote Speech at the “Science in Dialogue” Conference, Odense, April 23–25. Extraído el 24 de enero de 2022 desde https://ec.europa.eu/archives/commission_2010-2014/geoghegan-quinn/headlines/speeches/2012/documents/20120423-dialogue-conference-speech_en.pdf
GREGORY, J. y MILLER, S. (2000). Science in Public-Communication, Culture, and Credibility, New York: Basic Books.
HISHIYAMA R. (2012) Outreach Communication. En T. Ishida (Ed.) Field Informatics (pp. 157-169). Berlin: Springer.
IRWIN, A. y WYNNE, B. (1996). Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, New York: Cambridge University Press.
JOBIN, A., IENCA, M. y VAYENA, E. (2019). “The global landscape of AI ethics guidlines”. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389-399.
JOSS, S. (2002). “Toward the Public Sphere—Reflections on the Development of Participatory Technology Assessment”. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 22(3), 220-231.
MCCORDUCK, P. (1991). Máquinas que piensan, Barcelona: Tecnos
MCLEISH, C. y NIGHTINGALE, P. (2007). “Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the gobernance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy”. Research Policy, 36(10), 1635-1654.
MILLER, T., HOWE, P. y SONENBERG, L. (2017). “Explainable AI: Beware of Inmates Running the Asylum. Or: How I Learnt to Stop Worrying and Love the Social and Behavioural Sciences”. IJCAI 2017 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Extraído el 24 de enero de 2022 desde https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.00547
MILLER, T. (2019). “Explanation in artificial intelligente: Insights from the social sciences”. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1-38.
NOURBAKHSH, I. (2009). Ethics in Robotics. Extraído el 24 de enero de 2022 desde https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giKT8PkCCv4
LARSSON, S. y HEINTZ, F. (2020). “Transparency in artificial intelligence”. Internet Policy Review, 9(2).
LAYARD HORSFALL, H., PALMISCIANO, P., KHAN, D. Z., MUIRHEAD, W., KOH, C. H., STOYANOV, D. y MARCUS, H. J. (2021). “Attitudes of the Surgical Team Toward Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery: International 2-Stage Cross-Sectional Survey”. World Neurosurgery, 146, 724-730.
LECUE, F. y WU, J. (2018). “Semantic Explanation of Predictions”. Extraído el 24 de enero de 2022 desde https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.10587
LÓPEZ CEREZO, J. A. (2005). “Participación ciudadana y cultura científica”. Arbor: Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura, 715, 351-362.
PALMISCIANO, P., JAMJOOM, A. A. B., TAYLOR, D., STOYANOV, D. y MARCUS, H. J. (2020). “Attitudes of Patients and Their Relatives Toward Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery”. World Neurosurgery, 138, 627-633.
PARLAMENTO EUROPE Y CONSEJO DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA (2016). Reglamento General de Protección de Datos. Extraído el 24 de enero de 2022 desde https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32016R0679
PARRA, N.-H. y ARENAS-DOLZ, F. (2015). Revolución tecnológica y democracia del conocimiento. Por una universidad innovadora, Valencia: Laboratorio de la Sociedad del Conocimiento.
PERRAULT, S. (2013). Communicating Popular Science. From Deficit to Democracy, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
RIBEIRO, M. T., SINGH, S. y GUESTRIN, C. (2016). “’Why should I trust you?’: Explaining the predictions of any classifier”. En Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 1135-1144.
SHAPING, S. (2008). The Scientific Life. A moral History of a Late Modern Vocation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
STILGOE, J., OWEN, R. y MACNAGHTEN, P. (2013) “Developing a framework for responsible innovation”. Res Policy 42(9), 1568–1580.
TIMMERMANS J. (2021) Responsible Research and Innovation. En W. L. Filho., A. M. Azul ,L. Brandli, A. Lange Salvia y T. Wall (Eds), Decent Work and Economic Growth. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. London: Springer.
TOBOSO, M. y APARICIO, M. (2019). “Entornos de funcionamientos robotizados. ¿Es posible una robótica inclusiva?”. Dilemata, 30: 171-185.
TRENCH, B. (2008). Towards an Analytical Framework os Science Communication Moderls. En Cheng, D., M. Claessens, T. Ggascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele y S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practiques. New York: Springer.
VAN DEN HOVEN, J. (2014). Responsible innovation: a new look at technology and ethics. En J. VAN DEN HOVEN, N. DOORN, T. SWIERSTRA, B.-J. KOOPS, H. ROMIJN (Eds.), Responsible innovation 1 (pp. 3-13). Netherlands: Springer.
VASILJEVA, T., KREITUSS, I. y Lulle, I. (2021). “Artificial Intelligence: The Attitude of the Public and Representatives of Various Industries”. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(8), 339.
VON SCHOMBERG, R. (2011). Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields, Luxemburgo: European Commission-DG Research and Innovation
VON SCHOMBERG R (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation. En R. OWEN, J. R. BESSANT y M. HEINTZ (Eds.), Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 51-74). United States: Wiley-Blackwell.
WELD, D. S., y BANSAL, G. (2019). “The challenge of crafting intelligible intelligence”. Communications of the ACM, 62(6), 70-79.
YOUNG MD., A., AMARA MD., D., BHATTACHARYA BS. Y WEY MD., PROF. MARIA L. (2021). “Patient and general public attitudes towards clinical artificial intelligence: a mixed methods systematic review”. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(9), 599-611.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
