Headwalking.

Critical Notice on Filósofos de paseo

Authors

  • Ramón del Buey Cañas Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.47.2021.28855

Keywords:

Thinking, walking, philosophy of walking, philosophical walks, criticism of authenticity

Abstract

In Filósofos de paseo, Ramón del Castillo analyzes the relationship between thinking and walking from the case studies represented by nine philosophers and writers: Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Adorno, Wittgenstein, Sartre, Fowles and Walser. The present work aims to examine this approach and provide a number of critical comments on it. To this end, I will present the main ideas of each chapter of
the book, and examine the reading hypotheses proposed throughout them. In parallel, I will present considerations to assess these reflections, and I will argue my position concerning the theses sustained in the work in question.

Downloads

References

DEL CASTILLO, Ramón. (2020). Filósofos de paseo. Madrid: Turner.

JAMESON, Fredric. (2016). Marxismo y forma. Madrid: Akal.

KOLAKOWSKI, Leszek. (1970). El hombre sin alternativa. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

STERNE, Laurence. (2006). Tristram Shandy. Madrid: Alfaguara.

Published

2021-06-23

How to Cite

del Buey Cañas, R. (2021). Headwalking.: Critical Notice on Filósofos de paseo. ENDOXA, (47). https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.47.2021.28855

Issue

Section

Comments and Critical Notes

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.