Health Policy Economy in Equatorial Guinea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.37.2016.16614Keywords:
Colonial Medicine, Morbidity, Mortality, Disease, Biomedical TechnologiesAbstract
Medical interventions played a pivotal role in the European colonization
of Africa. Morbidity and disease were a constant preoccupation for colonial medical officers, the military, scientists, politicians, settlers, and members of the religious orders alike. The role of medicine and science in the architecture of the colonial administration is, therefore, inextricably intertwined with the legitimization of occupation, and the projects of the ‘civilizing mission’. The development of a biomedical discourse as part of the Spanish colonial enterprise in Equatorial Guinea contributed, from a very early stage, to the construction of what we understand by “Africa”, and of the African body as
a site of disease, requiring social repair, and as a subject of knowledge and observation in a repressive colonial state. Biomedical technologies served as powerful instruments of consolidation of colonial structures, particularly during the first half of the twentieth century. The present essay addresses the following questions: How was this biomedical knowledge produced and implemented, and what specificities characterized it? How was it brought into circulation both in colonial Guinea and in metropolitan Spain?
To what extent these biomedical technologies contributed to the solidification of the architecture of colonial power? Finally, often in postcolonial regimes health and fear are conflated under one same category, and act as stratagems of socio-political repression. The systemic pathology of dictatorships incorporates, as part of its etiology, clinical manifestations that include the obstruction of democratic values, and the fostering of socio-economic inequalities. The re-appropriation of concrete aspects of the colonial
biomedical apparatus is therefore useful to problematize questions of duration, reproduction and repetition under the current regimes.
Downloads
References
ANDERSON, W. (1998). “Where is the postcolonial history of medicine?”. Bull. Hist. Med., 72, 522-530.
BALLANTYNE, Tony y Burton, Antoinette, eds., (2005). Bodies in contact. Rethinking colonial encounters in world history. Durham: Duke University Press.
BELAUSTEGUI Fernández, Alejandro (2013). Sanitarios militares en Guinea Ecuatorial. 1858-1868. Madrid: Centro de Publicaciones del Ministerio de Defensa.
DE GRANDA Orive, J. (2011). “Sanidad Militar y aspectos sanitarios en Fernando Poo durante el gobierno de los brigadieres (1859-1869)” Sanidad Militar, 67, 1, 53-60.
FANON, Franz (1978). “Medicine and Colonialism”, en J. Ehrenreich, ed., The cultural crisis of modern medicine. New York: Monthly Review Press, 229-251.
FERRER Piera, Pablo (1900). Fernando Poo y sus dependencias. Descripción, producciones y estado sanitario. Barcelona: A. López Robert, Impresor.
HUNT, Nancy Rose (2013). “An acoustic register. Rape and repetition in Congo”. Ann Laura Stoler, ed. Imperial debris. On ruins and ruination. Durham: Duke University Press, 39-66.
LANDAU, Paul S. y Kaspin, Deborah, eds. (2003). Images and empires. Visuality in colonial and postcolonial Africa. University of California Press.
LIGERO Morote, Armando (1997). La sanidad en Guinea Ecuatorial, 1778-1968. Jaén: edición del autor.
MARKS, Shula (1997). “What is colonial about colonial medicine? And what has happened to imperialism and health?”. The Society for the Social History of Medicine, 10, 2, 205-219.
MARTÍNEZ Antonio, Francisco Javier (2009). “Imperio enfermizo. La singular mirada mórbida del primer franquismo en los documentales médicos sobre Marruecos y Guinea”, Medicina e historia. Revista de estudios históricos de las ciencias médicas, 4, 1-16.
MARTÍNEZ Domínguez, Víctor (1954). Estudio epidemiológico y clínico de la epidemia de lepra en la Guinea Española. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
MAYER, Ruth (2002). Artificial africas. Colonial images in the times of globalization. Hanover and London: University Press of New England.
MEDINA Doménech, Rosa María y Molero Mesa, Jorge (2002). “La ley sanitaria colonial. Marco legislativo para el análisis de la medicina colonial española en África”, en Díez Torre, Alejandro R. ed., Ciencia y memoria de África. Actas de las III jornadas sobre ‘Expediciones científicas y africanismo español. 1898-1998’. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá de Henares.
MEDINA Doménech, Rosa María (2003). “Desconocimiento y desidia en la interpretación colonial de la morbilidad palúdica”, en Rodríguez Ocaña, Esteban, ed. La acción médico-social contra el paludismo en la España metropolitana y colonial del siglo XX. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 383-427.
MONTALDO y Peró, Federico (1898). Guía práctica, higiénica y médica del europeo en los países tórridos. Filipinas, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Fernando Poo. Madrid: Imp. de Ricardo Rojas.
_____ (1898). Fernando Poo. Observaciones médicas e higiénicas. Madrid: Celestino Apaolaza Imp.
MORTON, Adam David (2005). “The ‘failed state’ of international relations”, New Political Economy, 10, 3 (septiembre), 371-379.
NÁJERA Ángulo, Luis (1931). “El factor sanitario y las explotaciones forestales en la Guinea española”, Montes e industrias, 3, (enero), 15-18.
_____ (1932). Los territorios españoles en el Golfo de Guinea. Estado sanitario actual y su influencia sobre el desarrollo de la colonización. Madrid: Impr. del P. de H. de Intendencia e Intervención Militares.
_____ (1932). “Expediente incoado para esclarecer las denuncias formuladas por D. Luis Nájera y D. Higinio París, Presidente y Secretario de la asociación de médicos coloniales, sobre la situación de los servicios sanitarios en los territorios españoles del Golfo de Guinea”, Archivo General de la Administración, África, Sección 15,
Fondo 4, Caja 81-06336.
_____ (1944). “La sanidad pública y la colonización africana”, Revista de sanidad e higiene pública, 18, 299-304.
_____(1944). “El paludismo náutico”, Revista Ibérica de Parasitología, IV, 3, 343-355.
NÅJERA Morrondo, Rafael (2006). “El Instituto de salud Carlos III y la sanidad española. Origen de la medicina de laboratorio, de los institutos de salud pública y de la investigación sanitaria”, Revista española de salud pública, 5, septiembre-octubre, 585-604.
NERÍN, Gustau (2010). La última selva de España. Antropófagos, misioneros y guardias civiles. Madrid: La catarata.
QUINLAN, Sean (2005). “Colonial bodies, hygiene, and abolitionist politics in eighteenth-century France”, en Tony Ballantyne y Antoinette Burton, eds., Bodies in contact. Rethinking colonial encounters in world history. Durham: Duke University Press.
ROBERTS, Andrew (2013). “Salisbury, the empire builder who never was”, History Today, 49, 10, sin página. Disponible en: http://www.historytoday.com/andrewroberts/salisbury-empire-builder-who-never-was
STEHRENBERGER, Cécile Stephanie (2014). “Medicina colonial y literatura franquista: el caso de las novelas de Liberata Masoliver”, Revista Debats, 123, 2, 48-57.
STOLER, Ann Laura (2008). “Imperial debris: reflections on ruins and ruination”, Cultural Anthropology, 23, 2, 191-219.
_____ (2013). Imperial debris. On ruins and ruination. Durham: Duke University Press.
STORM, Eric (2004). “The problems of the Spanish nation-building process around 1900”, National Identities, 6. 2 (julio), 143-157.
URTEAGA, Luis (1980). “El higienismo en España en el siglo XIX y el paradigma de las topografías médicas”. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Barcelona.
VAUGHAN, Megan (1991). Curing their ills. Colonial power and African illness. Stanford:Stanford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal must agree to the following terms:
- The authors hold author’s rights and guarantee the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows others to share the work as long as they acknowledge the authorship of the work and its initial publication in this journal.
- The authors can establish, on their own, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), always acknowledging the initial publication in this journal.
- The authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own webpages) before and during the submission process, as this can give rise to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and increased citing of the works published (See The Effect of Open Access).