El papel de la inteligencia artificial generativa en la publicación científica

Checco, A., Bracciale, L., Loreti, P., Pinfield, S., & Bianchi, G. (2021). AI-assisted peer review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00703-8

Committee on Publication Ethics. (2019). Discussion document: Authorship (Version 2). https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.3

Committee on Publication Ethics. (2023). Authorship and AI tolos. COPE position statement. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review. Learned Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1570

López-Martín, E., & Martín, S. (2023). Guía para integrar las tecnologías basadas en inteligencia artificial generativa en los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje. UNED.

McAdoo, T. (2023). How to cite ChatGPT. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt

National Institutes of Health. (2023). The use of generative artificial intelligence technologies is prohibited for the NIH Peer Review Process. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-23-149.html

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Artificial intelligence in science challenges, opportunities and the future of research. https://www.oecd.org/publications/artificial-intelligence-in-science-a8d820bd-en.htm

Salvagno, M., & Taccone, F. S. (2023). Artificial intelligence is the new chief editor of Critical Care (maybe?). Critical Care, 27(1), 270. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04455-0

Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313-313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg787

United States Copyright Office. (2023). Copyright registration guidance: Works containing material generated by artificial intelligence. Federal Register, 88(51), 16190-19194. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-03-16/pdf/2023-05321.pdf