Responsibility as ultimate foundation of philosophy

Authors

  • Rosemary Rizo Patrón de Lerner Círculo Latinoamericano de Fenomenología/ Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/rif.4-II.2013.29799

Keywords:

self-responsibility, ultimate foundations, husserlian phenomenology, validity foundation, genetical foundation, absolute consciousness

Abstract

Husserl’s phenomenology has been frequently referred to as a “philosophy of ultimate foundation and radical self-responsibility.” Yet here we will examine philosophy’s notion of “ultimate foundation” as “radical self-responsibility.” The “idea of philosophy” that Husserl proposes as a “universal and rigorous science” of “ultimate foundation” has been grossly misinterpreted by his contemporary critics, who have not paid heed to his clarifica-tion that this idea is “to be realized only by way of relative and temporary validities and in an infinite historical process,” nor to the fact that he has already recasted the traditional Modern notion of reason. That philosophy is called upon to provide an ultimate foundation to every accomplishment of reason, as well as its own justification, means that it is ultimately responsible for every sense and validity in general, and for itself. However, the active conscious ego, with its rational –cognitive, volitional and emotional–  accomplishments, as the “absolute foundation of all my validations,” is preceded by a deeper, pre-conscious, irrational, and passive stratum of emotional and desiderative tendencies, impulses, instincts and strivings towards consciousness and rationality. Thus every “evidencing” and Geltungsfundierung is finally absorbed within Genesisfundierung. Ultimately no rational “evidence” can ever be “adequate,” but is essentially openended, and inadequate. Husserl’s much criticized “absolute consciousness” is in fact an “absolute” rooted in a “more definite and true absolute,” namely, the identity and difference of the static-fluent living present belonging to a finite, temporal, perspectivist, incarnate and intersubjective being. The defense of reason and of “foundational discourse” is for Husserl a question of “humanity’s survival” and its preservation from barbarity. Yet it is not a “permanent acquisition” but the responsibility of an “infinite task.” Thus philosophy is an “all-embracing science grounded on an absolute foundation [...] though of course in the form of an endless program."

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-02-11

How to Cite

Rizo Patrón de Lerner, R. (2021). Responsibility as ultimate foundation of philosophy. Investigaciones Fenomenológicas, (4-II), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.5944/rif.4-II.2013.29799