The problem of the unit of study in the investigation of the psychotherapeutic discourse and process

Authors

  • Robert Russell New school for Social Research, New York
  • Carol Staszewski New school for Social Research, New York

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v10i10.933

Keywords:

psychotherapeutic discourse,, classical psychiatry

Abstract

Review of empirical and methodological literature concerning studies of psychotherapeutic discourse indicates that the selection of units for study is infrequently carried out on a principled basis. To help remedy this situation, seven descriptive dimensions with which scoring units can be explicity defined are presented and explicated. In addition, four critical dilemmas are identified that process researchers will have to confront in providing rationales for their particular unit choices. Curricular changes and new guidelines for research reports are recommended as means to facilitate area wide sophistication and accountability in process research.Classical psychiatry has frequently emphasized linguistic phenomena in psychopathology, especially in relation to schizophrenia; however, this focus has not studied language nuances, characteristic of emotional ilness as variants in expressive styles, rather the focus has been on particularities in speech as representative of disturbed thought processes. This article examines the vicissitudes in the study of schizophrenic language from the mid-nineteenth century and shows how these past developments have given rise to confusion regarding the mental status of the psychologically disturbed. To remedy this confusion the present article proposes alternate forms of conceptualizing the linguistic phenomena associated with psychopathology, advocating for the conceptualizing of language particularities in psychopatologies as specific differential expressive styles, as can be demonstrated with the examples of schizophrenia and obsessive disorder.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Austin, J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. New York: Oxford University Press.

Berelson, B. (1952). Content-Analysis in Communication Research. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.

Burke, K. (1971). Dramatism and Development. Worcester, Mass: Clark University Press.

Dittes, J.E. (1959). Previous studies bearing on content analysis of psychotherapy. In J. Dollard and F. Auld, Jr. (Eds.), Scoring Human Motives: A Manual. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. Dollard, J., & Auld, F., Jr. (1959). Scoring Human Motives: A Manual. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

Elliott, R. (1983), “That in your hands”: A comprehensive process analysis of a significant event in psychotherapy. Psychiatry, 46, 113-129.

Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against Method. London: Redwood Burn Limited.

Fishman, J.A. (1970). Sociolinguistics: A Brief Introduction. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House Publishers.

Fiske, D.W., & Shweder, R.A. (Eds.) (1986). Metatheory in the Social Sciences: Pluralisms and Subjectivities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fodor, J.D. (1977). Semantics: Theories of Meaning in Generative Grammar. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.

Greenbero, L. (1986). Change process research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 4-9.

Grice, H.P. (1968). Utterer’s meaning, sentence meaning, and word meaning. Foundations of Language, 4, 1-18.

Hanson, N.R. (1958). Patterns of Discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Henry, W.P., Schacht, T.E., & Strupp, H.H. (1986). Structural analysis of social behavior: Application to a study of interpersonal process in differential psychotherapeutic outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 27-31. KIESLER, D.J. (1966). Some myths of psychotherapy research and the search for a paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 110-136. Kiesler, D.J. (1973). The Process of Psychotherapy. Chicago: Aldine.

Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.

Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., & Mellomn, J. (1986). Advent of objective measures of the transference concept. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 39-47.

Mahl, G.F. (1987). Everyday disturbances of speech. In R.L. Russell (Ed.), Language in Psychotherapy: Strategies of Discovery (pp. 213-269). New York: Plenum Press.

Mahrer, A.R., & Nadler, W.P. (1986). Good moments in psychotherapy: A preliminary review, a list, and some promising research avenues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 10-15.

Marsden, G. (1965). Content-analysis studies of therapeutic interviews: 1954 to 1964, Psychological Bulletin, 63,298-321. MARSDEN, G. (1971). Content-analysis of psychotherapy: 1954-1968, In A.E. Bergin and S.L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (pp. 345-407). New York: John Wiley.

Pea, R.D., & Russell, R.L. (1980), Foundation for a scientific theory of communicative development. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Conference on Child Language Development. Boston.

Pea, R.D., & Russell, R.L. (1987). Ethnography and the vicissitudes of talk in psychotherapy. In R.L. Russell (Ed.), Language in Psychotherapy: Strategies of Discovery (pp. 303-338), New York: Plenum Press.

Pepper, S.C. (1942). World Hypotheses. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Berkeley University Press.

Russell, R.L. (1979). Speech acts, conversational sequencing, and rules: A symposium review of W. Labov & D. Fanshel's Therapeutic Discourse. Contemporary Sociology, 8, 168-179.

Russell, R.L. (1984a). Empirical Investigations of Psychotherapeutic Techniques: A Critique of and Prospects for Language Analysis. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms International.

Russell, R.L. (1984b). Kenneth Leiter’s. A Primeron Ethnomethodology: Á review. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 15, 172-174.

Russell, R.L. (1986a). Verbal response modes as species of speech acts? An unhappy case of an interdisciplinary merger, Explorations in Knowledge, 3, 14-24.

Russell, R.L. (1986b). Inadvisability of admixing psychoanalysis with other forms of psychotherapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 16, 76-86.

Russell, R.L. (1987), How strong is the strength of treatment idea? Paper presented at the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Ulm, Germany.

Russell, R.L. (1983), A new classification scheme for studies of verbal behavior in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 25, 51-58. Russell, R.L., & Trull, T.J. (1987), Sequential analysis of language variables in psychotherapy process research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 16-21.

Russell, R.L., & Van den Brock, P, (In press). A cognitive/developmental account of storytelling in child psychotherapy. In S.R. Shirk (Ed.), Cognitive Development and Child Psychotherapy. New York: Plenum Press.

Schenkein, J. (1978). Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press.

Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stein, N.L. (1982). What's in a story: Interpreting the interpretations of story grammars. Discourse Processes, 5, 319-335.

Stiles, W.B. (1987). Process outcome correlations may be misleading. Paper presented at the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Ulm, Germany.

Strupp, H.H. (1978). Psychotherapy research and practice: An overview. In S.L. Garfield and A.E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change: An Empirical Analysis (pp. 3-22). New York: John Wiley.

Published

1992-07-01

How to Cite

Russell , R., & Staszewski, C. (1992). The problem of the unit of study in the investigation of the psychotherapeutic discourse and process. Revista de Psicoterapia, 3(10/11), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v10i10.933

Issue

Section

Monographic Articles