Gender identity.

Authors

  • María Jayme Zaro Facultad de Psicología (UB). Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v10i40.791

Keywords:

Sex, Gender, Identity, Socialisation, Stereotypes

Abstract

Traditionally human sex differences has constituted the base upon to articulate some differences between men and women that go beyond the contents biophysiologicals and so to determine in some degree their existence. Such differentiation is an effect from a double construction, sociocultural and psychological, whose contents define that which at present is understood by gender. The sociocultural component is the responsible of the reality’s categorisation upon a duality of opposites, masculinity vs. femininity, nourished by stereotypes and articulated in roles than on is transmitted lengthways the socialisation process since the individual’s birth. The psychological component refers to the active construction that everyone perform about this sociocultural message, learning what means to be woman or men and how to behave consequently. This process defines individual’s gender identity, at core of self: how each person has understood their sex and how attribute him some characteristics and some contents. That do him to identified, at last, with a masculinity and/or femininity unique with respect the others humans beings, but simultaneously in congruence with social expectancies. In this paper on detail too the importance of socialisation’s agents in the transmission of gender identity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acker, S. (1995). Género y educación. Madrid: Ariel.

Deaux, K. y Lewis, L.L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: interrelationships among related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.

Fierro, A. (1995). Persona, individu i personalitat. En Psicologia de la Personalitat. Barcelona: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.

Guidano, V. y Liotti, R. (1983). El constructivismo en la relación terapéutica. En Mahoheny, M.J. y Freeman, A. (Eds.), Cognición y Psicoterapia. Barcelona: Paidós.

Hare-Mustin, R.T. y Marececk, J. (1994). Marcar la diferencia. Barcelona: Herder.

Jayme, M. (1996). Identidad personal y de género. V Jornadas de coeducación como marco para educar. VitoriaGasteitz: EMAKUNDE.

Jayme, M. y Sau, V. (1996). Psicología diferencial del sexo y el género. Barcelona: Icaria.

Kohlberg, L. (1966). Análisis de los conceptos y actitudes infantiles relativos al papel sexual desde el punto de vista del desarrollo cognitivo. En Maccoby, E.E. (Ed.), Desarrollo de las diferencias sexuales. Madrid: Marova.

Money, J. y Ehrarhdt, A.A. (1972).

Man & Woman- Boy & Girl. John Hopkins Univ. Press. Ross, A.O. (1987). Personality. The scientific study of complex human behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wiston.

Rubin et al. (1970). Social and cultural influences on sex role development. The eye of the beholder. Parent’s views on sex of new borns. American Jorunal of Orthosychiatry, 44, 512-519.

Sánchez, A. (1996). El dessarrollo del sexo como variable estímulo durante la infancia. En Fernández, J. (Coord.), Varones y mujeres. Desarrollo de la doble realidad del sexo y el género. Madrid: Pirámide.

Sau, V. (1988). Reflexiones sobre la discusión teóricas sobre el doble concepto de sexo-género. II Jornadas para una educación no sexista. Zaragoza: Instituto de la Mujer.

Subirats, M. y Brullet, C. (1988). Rosa y Azul. La transmisión de estereotipos en la infancia. Madrid: Instituto de la Mujer.

Unger, R.K. (1979). Toward a definition of sex and gender. American Psychologist, 11, 1085-1094.

Published

1999-11-01

How to Cite

Jayme Zaro, M. (1999). Gender identity. Revista de Psicoterapia, 10(40), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v10i40.791