Lo avistado por Merleau-Ponty de la mano de Husserl: mundo, percepción y carne

Authors

  • José Antonio Ramos González

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.34.2014.9305

Keywords:

Mundo, percepción, carne, movimiento, tocar, ver.

Abstract

Este artículo pretende mostrar elcontraste entre las filosofías de Husserl y de Merleau-Ponty a la vista de laexperiencia de la mano tocante-tocada descrita en Ideas II. Frente al privilegio concedido al tacto en la constitucióndel cuerpo propio, la valoración del movimiento permitirá a Merleau-Pontypensar una reversibilidad entre el tocar y el ver (entre lo tangible y lovisible) decisiva para elaborar la noción de Carne. En la medida en que lafenomenología alcanza su límite en la experiencia del tocar, esta será crucialpara establecer las diferencias entre ambos filósofos respecto de aquellascuestiones decisivas en el pensamiento fenomenológico: mundo, percepción ycarne.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José Antonio Ramos González

Downloads

Published

2015-04-23

How to Cite

Ramos González, J. A. (2015). Lo avistado por Merleau-Ponty de la mano de Husserl: mundo, percepción y carne. ENDOXA, (34), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.34.2014.9305

Issue

No. 34 (2014)

Section

Miscellaneous

License

The authors who publish in this journal must agree to the following terms:

  • The authors hold author’s rights and guarantee the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows others to share the work as long as they acknowledge the authorship of the work and its initial publication in this journal.
  • The authors can establish, on their own, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), always acknowledging the initial publication in this journal.
  • The authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own webpages) before and during the submission process, as this can give rise to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and increased citing of the works published (See The Effect of Open Access).