SCHELLING, DELEUZE AND THE ANTICARTESIAN AND ANTIHEGELIAN REACTION

Authors

  • Benito Arbaizar Gil Universidad Santiago de Compostela

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.51.2023.28516

Keywords:

Idea, diferencia, indiferencia, voluntad, dialéctica, naturaleza.

Abstract

This article focuses on highlighting the way in which Schelling appears in Deleuze’s work as a link that makes it possible to connect the anti-Cartesian reaction of Spinoza and Leibniz (claiming the appetitive dimension of nature) with Deleuze’s own anti-Hegelian attitude. The voluntarist turn that Schelling gives to philosophy is also prolonged by Deleuze and Guattari when they establish schizophrenia as a libidinal ontological unconscious through which desiring intensities circulate freely. In a similar way, Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism gains momentum in the Schellingian conception of being as In-difference between the subjective and the objective, prior to all foundation or duality.

Downloads

Author Biography

Benito Arbaizar Gil, Universidad Santiago de Compostela

Soy doctor (con una tesis sobre Descartes) desde el año 1990 y soy un catedrático de instituto  que lleva ejerciendo como profesor de secundaria desde el año 1985. Por lo que se refiere a mi experiencia como docente universitario decir que trabajé desde el año 1999 hasta el 2017 en la UNED (como profesor tutor en el centro asociado de A Coruña) y que, desde el 2017 ejerzo como profesor asociado (P6) en el Departamento de Filosofía y Antropología de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Estoy acreditado para presentarme a plazas de contratado-doctor.

References

DUQUE, F. (1998). Historia de la Filosofía Moderna. La era crítica, Madrid, Akal, 1998.

FRANK, M. (1992). Der Unendliche Mangel an Sein. Schellings Hegelkritik und die Anfänge der Marxsche Dialektik, München, Verlag.

HEGEL, G.W.F: (1807) Phänomenologie des Geistes, en Werke in 20 Bänden. Auf der Grundlage der Werke von 1832 bis 1845 neu edierte. Redaktion: Eva Moldenhauer, Karl Markus Michel. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main 1970, Band 3. GW en lo sucesivo.

— (1812). Wissenschaft der Logik., Erster Band: Die objektive Logik GW 11.

— (1816). Wissenschaft der Logik, Zweiter Band: Die subjektive Logik GW 12.

— (1823). Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, II, GW 19.

— (1830). Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse, II, Band 9.

— (1830a). Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse, III, Band 10.

HEIDEGGER, M., (1949). «Brief über den Humanismus», en Wegmarken, Gesamtausgabe 9, Fráncfort del Meno: Klostermann, 1975-ss. GA en lo sucesivo.

— (1956). Der Satz vom Grund, GA, 10.

— (1988). Schelling: Vom Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit, GA 42.

LEIBNIZ, G. W. (1676) “Pacidius Philalethi”, en G. W. LEIBNIZ, Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Sechster Reihe, Philosophische Schriften, Dritter Band 1672 -1676, Berlin, Akademie-Verlag, 1980.

LEYTE, A. y Rühle, V.. (1989). “Estudio introductorio a Investigaciones filosóficas sobre la esencia de la libertad humana”, Barcelona, Anthopos, 1989.

MARTÍNEZ MARZOA, F. (1987). Desconocida raíz común, Barcelona, Visor.

MERCHANT, C. (1989). The Death of Nature, New York, HarperOne, 1989.

PARDO, J-L. (1990). Deleuze: violentar el pensamiento, Madrid, Cincel, 1990, p.121.

SCHELLING, F.W.J. (1795). Philosophische Briefe über Dogmatismus und Kriticismus, Schellings Werke, I, Munich, C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1927-1965. SW en lo sucesivo.

— (1800) System des trascendentalen Idealismus, SW, III.

— (1801) Darstellung meines Systems der Philosophie, SW IV.

— (1802) Philosophie der Kunst, SW V.

— (1809) Philosophische Untersuchungen über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit und die damit zusammenhängenden, SW VII.

— (1827) Zur Geschichte der neueren Philosophie. Münchener Vorlesungen, SW X.

SCHULZ, W. (1955). Die Vollendung des deutschen Idealismus in der Spätphilosophie Schellings, Kohlkamer W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, Verlag,.

ŽIŽEK, S. (2015). Menos que nada, Madrid, Akal.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-20

How to Cite

Arbaizar Gil, B. (2023). SCHELLING, DELEUZE AND THE ANTICARTESIAN AND ANTIHEGELIAN REACTION. ENDOXA, (51). https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.51.2023.28516

Issue

No. 51 (2023)

Section

Papers and Texts

License

Copyright (c) 2023 ENDOXA

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The authors who publish in this journal must agree to the following terms:

  • The authors hold author’s rights and guarantee the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows others to share the work as long as they acknowledge the authorship of the work and its initial publication in this journal.
  • The authors can establish, on their own, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), always acknowledging the initial publication in this journal.
  • The authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own webpages) before and during the submission process, as this can give rise to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and increased citing of the works published (See The Effect of Open Access).

 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)