Hume: An Open Door to Atheism?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.54.2024.27591

Keywords:

skepticism, agnosticism, deism, atheism, monotheism, immortality of the soul

Abstract

Hume does not share atheism’s indispensable premise (God does not exist) but he argues that we only can assure what exists by proof and verification. Causality, substance, and the self are only beliefs. This overwhelming skepticism will influence inevitably his idea of God. Hume’s philosophy shares with atheism three crucial points: 1. Criticism of the design argument; 2. Mortality of the soul; 3. Criticism of the monotheistic religions. With this paper I intend to show that Hume’s philosophy, even though being skeptical, opens a door to atheism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Antonia Tejeda Barros, Tiergarten 4 Association, Berlín 

Antonia Tejeda Barros (Barcelona, 1975) es investigadora (Shoah) en la Tiergarten 4 Association en Berlín, Doctora en Filosofía (UNED, 2023, cum laude), Magíster en Filosofía (UNED, 2015, cum laude) y Bachelor of Music (Música Antigua y Pedagogía, 2002, Koninklijk Conservatorium, La Haya). Sus áreas de investigación son la Shoah, el antisemitismo, Viktor Frankl, Primo Levi, Sartre, Ortega, Unamuno y Hannah Arendt. Está escribiendo un libro sobre Sartre, Frankl, Auschwitz y el sentido y sinsentido del sufrimiento de las víctimas. Ha sido invitada a dar conferencias sobre Viktor Frankl, Primo Levi y la Shoah en el Centro Sefarad Israel.

References

Bibliografía

Allen, W. (2020). Apropos of Nothing. New York: Arcade Publishing.

Ayer, A. J. (2000). Hume. A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

Berlin, I. (1956). The Age of Enlightenment. New York: New American Library.

Camus, A. (2011). Le mythe de Sisyphe. France: Gallimard.

Cioran, E. (2010). Précis de décomposition. France: Gallimard.

Freud, S. (2003). Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. Stuttgart: Reclam.

Garrett, D. (2012). “What’s True about Hume’s ‘True Religion’?”, Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 10 (2), 199–220.

Hume, D. (1739, 1740). A Treatise of Human Nature. Hume Texts Online. https://davidhume.org/texts/t/full.

— (1741, 1777). “On Superstition and Enthusiasm”. En Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, Part 1. Hume Texts Online. https://davidhume.org/texts/empl1/sc.

— (1742, 1777). “The Sceptic”. En Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, Part 1. Hume Texts Online. https://davidhume.org/texts/empl1/sc.

— (1745). A Letter from a Gentleman to his friend in Edinburgh. Hume Texts Online. https://davidhume.org/texts/l.

— (1748, 1777). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Hume Texts Online. https://davidhume.org/texts/e/full.

— (1755, 1777a). Of Suicide. Hume Texts Online. https://davidhume.org/texts/su.

— (1755, 1777b). Of the Immortality of the Soul. Hume Texts Online. https://david-hume.org/texts/is.

— (1757, 1777). The Natural History of Religion. Hume Texts Online. https://david- hume.org/texts/n/full.

— (1779). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Hume Texts Online. https://david- hume.org/texts/d/full.

Kail, P. (2010). “Hume’s Naturalistic Critique of Religion”. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie, 72 (3), 481–495.

Küng, H. (2011). Projekt Weltethos. München: Piper.

Leibniz, G. W. (1969). Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l’homme et l’origine du mal. París: Garnier-Flammarion.

López Sastre, G. (2010). “David Hume o la reflexión escéptica sobre el mundo reli- gioso”. En Manuel Fraijó (Ed.), Filosofía de la religión. Estudios y textos (4a ed.) (pp. 159–171). Madrid: Trotta.

Mill, J. S. (2012). The Utility of Religion. En Nature, The Utility of Religion, and Theism (pp. 69–122). Great Britain: Forgotten Books.

Millican, P. “Editorial Notes. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion”, Hume Texts Online. https://davidhume.org/texts/d/notes.

— “Editorial Notes. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding”, Hume Texts Online. https://davidhume.org/texts/e/notes.

Morris, W. E. y C. R. Brown (2019). “David Hume”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/hume/.

Mossner, E. C. (1978). “The Religion of David Hume”. Journal of the History of Ideas, 39 (4), 653–663.

Nietzsche, F. (2011a). Die fröhliche Wissenschaft. En Giorgio Colli y Mazzino Mon- tinari (Eds.), KSA 3: Morgenröte. Idyllen aus Messina. Die fröhliche Wissenschaft (8a ed.) (pp. 343–651). München: dtv.

— (2011b). Also sprach Zarathustra. En Giorgio Colli y Mazzino Montinari (Eds.), KSA 4 (13a ed.). München: dtv.

Parusniková, Z. (2014). “Hume’s Scepticism Revisited”, Philosophy, 89 (350), 581–602.

Russell, B. (1943). An Outline of Intellectual Rubbish. A Hilarious Catalogue of Organized and Individual Stupidity. Girard (Kansas): Hadelman-Julius Publications

— (2007a). History of Western Philosophy (repr. ed.). London: Routledge.

— (2007b). Why I Am Not a Christian. En Why I Am Not a Christian and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects (reprinted ed.) (pp. 1–19). London: Routledge.

— (2007c). Has Religion Made Useful Contributions to Civilisation? En Why I Am Not a Christian and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects (reprinted ed.) (pp. 20–41). London: Routledge.

Sartre, Jean-Paul (2010). L’être et le néant. Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. France: Gallimard.

Savater, F. (2009). La aventura de pensar. Barcelona: Debolsillo.

Thrower, J. (2000). Western Atheism. A Short History. New York: Prometheus Books.

Unamuno, M. (2008). Del sentimiento trágico de la vida en los hombres y en los pueblos (7a reimpr.). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Published

2024-12-09

How to Cite

Tejeda Barros, A. (2024). Hume: An Open Door to Atheism?. ENDOXA, (54). https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.54.2024.27591

Issue

Section

Comments and Critical Notes

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.