Conversaciones tempranas: comunicación y diálogo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.7.2.211Palabras clave:
Communication, dialogue, intersubjectivity, infancy, proto-conversation.Resumen
Abstract
What is dialogue and how can we find it? This paper addresses this question in the context of tracing the origins of communication in human infancy. Structural criteria - such as turn taking -have often been used to identify genuine communication. Implementing these criteria have led to considerable debate in relation to the 'proto-conversations' of the twomonth- old, debates which arose in the late 1970s and are still alive today. The paper considers some of the evidence from infant behaviour involved in these debates and in relation to the question of infants' awareness of the 'meaning' of adult facial expressions. In addition to these structural criteria it is suggested that functional criteria such as openness and recognition might be important for our understanding of the origins of dialogue. The paper discusses the apparent paradox of language -how communication is needed to make private experience public, but at the same time, cannot occur until experience is already public- and argues that this paradox disappears if shared experience rather than private representation is taken as primary.
Descargas
Descargas
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
La revista Acción Psicológica se publica bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento – NoComercial (CC BY-NC). Las opiniones y contenidos de los artículos publicados en Acción Psicológica son de responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no comprometen la opinión y política científica de la revista. También serán responsables de proporcionar copias de los datos en bruto, puntuaciones, y, en general, material experimental relevante a los lectores interesados.
Copyright Note
Acción Psicológica is published under Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial (CC BY-NC). The opinions and contents of the articles published in Acción Psicológica are responsibility of the authors and do not compromise the scientific and political opinion of the journal. Authors are also responsible for providing copies of the raw data, ratings, and, in general, relevant experimental material to interested readers.
