The “whistleblower”: the good sneak. Protection of whistleblowers on regulatory and anti-corruption breaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/rduned.35.2025.45874Keywords:
anonymous complaint, whistleblower, information channels, whistleblower protection, evidential assessmentAbstract
Gradually, the need to promote a culture of transparency and good governance has taken hold in the legal systems of our environment, not only in the private sector but also in the public one. In order to achieve these objectives, it is essential to establish different instruments that serve to prevent or pursue fraudulent and corrupt behaviors in these environments, the impact of which on the entire citizenry and the economy is undeniable. Aware of this, the legislator understood that a good way to combat such corruption was to encourage individuals who were aware of such practices to report them, providing them with the protection of anonymity. Despite the concerns raised by anonymous reporting, it is now regarded as a useful measure to enhance collaboration with justice, serving as a starting point for investigating possible crimes within companies. A different issue -which will be duly addressed- is that of the formal irregularities that may occur in the complaint filed, its admissibility requirements, and its assessment in court.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista de Derecho de la UNED (RDUNED)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Las obras están bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que:
- Se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra).
- No se usen para fines comerciales.
- Se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
