Relational Diagnosis: A Dynamic and Transtheoretical Assessment focused on the Person through Relationship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v32i118.483Keywords:
transtheory, transdiagnosis, psychodiagnosis, relational diagnosis, integrative relational psychotherapyAbstract
Starting from the general meaning of the concept of Diagnosis, this work focuses on Psychodiagnosis and, from there, delves into the form and substance of a psychodiagnosis in the field of Integrative Relational Psychotherapy, as a transtheoretical and transdiagnostic model. Or what is the same, relational diagnosis, as a global vision of the person, from the physiological, emotional, cognitive, relational, behavioral and spiritual dimensions. In the development of this article, the history of rejection of the classic diagnostic concept is reviewed, from different psychotherapeutic schools, among them Humanistic Psychotherapies. It reflects on the effects of the diagnosis on clients. And it describes, by way of example, a particular way of carrying out, of putting into practice, the process of Relational Diagnosis.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. This license allows third parties to cite the text and use it without alteration and for non-commercial purposes, provided they credit the authorship of the work and its first publication in this journal.
-
Authors may enter into other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), provided they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
-
The views expressed in the articles are solely the responsibility of the authors and in no case do they reflect the opinions or scientific policies of the journal.
