The Mythical-Historical Subject as a Philosophical Paradigm in Isocrates
Keywords:
Paradigm, Historical subjects, Philosophy of life, TheseusAbstract
The Isocratic system of thought is based on the conception of a philosophy of life that despises the ontological and religious world; thus, the answer to the problems of the pólis and social coexistence is provided by the use of paradigmatic figures that arise from a reading of history itself in accordance not only with the needs of the moment but with the intention of having a firm ethical and political response. These figures are not a mere rhetorical device but rather an element that becomes a continuum that will appear throughout his work and will prevent him from falling into a radical relativism.
Downloads
References
ASSMANN J. (2005). Egipto. Historia de un sentido, Madrid: Abada Editores.
BLANK, T. G. M. (2013). «Isocrates on paradoxical discourse. An analysis of Helen and Busiris», Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, Vol. 3, nº. 1, pp. 1-33.
BIANCO, E. (2007). «La digressione di Isocrate su Timoteo». En Lo stratego Timoteo torre di Atene, Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso, pp.61-89.
BRUNELLO, C. (2015). Storia e paideia nel Panatenaico di Isocrate. Roma: Sapienza Università Editrice.
CALAME, C. (2018). Thésée et l'imaginaire athénien. Legende et culte en Grèce Antique, Paris: La Découverte.
CAMPBELL (2020). «Paradoxology and Politics: How Isocrates Sells his School and his Political Agenda in the Busiris», Classical Philology Vol. 115 Nº 1, pp. 1-26. Preprint disponible en https://www.ianjcampbell.com/research
CLOCHÉ, P. (2019). Isócrates y su tiempo, Madrid: Punto de Vista Editores.
FROIDEFOND, C. (1971). Le mirage égyptien dans la littérature grecque d’Homère à Aristote, Aix-en-Provence: Université des lettres et sciences humaines.
GOTTELAND, S. (2001). Mythe et rhétorique. Les exemplres mythiques dans le discours politique de l’Athènes classique, París: Les Belles Lettres.
MATHIEU, G. (1966). Les idées politiques d’Isocrate, París: Les Belles Lettres.
MATHIEU, G. & Brémond, E. (1960-63). Isocrate. Discours I-IV, París: Les Belles Lettres.
GUZMÁN, J. M. (1979-80). Isócrates. Discursos I-II, Madrid: Gredos.
HERNÁNDEZ DE LA FUENTE, D. (2013). «Egipto como Utopía: sobre el Busiris de Isócrates y su posible relación con el pensamiento político de Platón», Cuadernos de filología clásica. Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos, vol. 23, pp. 189-205.
JAEGER, W. (1990 [1933]). Paideia: los ideales de la cultura griega, Madrid: FCE.
LIVINGSTONE, N. (2001). A commentary on Isocrates' Busiris, Leiden: Brill.
MIRHADY, D C. & Too, I. L. (2000). Isocrates I, Austin: University Texas Press.
MORALES CATURLA, T. (2014). El Critias de Platón. Un mundo mítico para una irrealizable épica del Bien. Tesis Doctoral. Madrid: UNED.
— (2019). « La trilogía chipriota de Isócrates: diplomacia, monarquía y filosofía política». Hybris, vol.10, nº 2, pp-13-44.
MOTTE, A. & SOMVILLE, P (eds.) (2008). Ousia dans la philosophe grecque. Des origines à Aristote, Louvain-La-Neuve: Peeters, p. 40-41.
NOUHAUD M. (1982). L‘utilisationde l’histoire par les orateurs Attiques, París: Les Belles Lettres.
PAPILLON, T. L. (2001). «Rhetoric, Art, and Myth: Isocrates and Busiris». En The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome: essays in honor of George A. Kennedy (Cecil W. Wooten ed.), Brill, pp. 73-91.
— (2004). Isocrates II, Austin: University Texas Press.
PERLMAN, S. (1961). «The Historical Example, Its Use and Importance as Political Propaganda in the Attic Orators», Studies in history scripta hierosolymitana. Publications of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem 7, pp. 150-166.
RACE, W. H. (1978). «Panathenaicus 74-90: The Rhetoric of Isocrates' Digression on Agamemnon», Transactions of the American Philological Association, Vol. 108, pp. 175-185.
SIGNES CODOÑER, J. (1996). «El Panatenaico de Isócrates: 1 - el excursus de Agamenón», Emerita LXIV 1, pp. 138-156.
TOO, Y. L. (1995). The rhetoric of identity in Isocrates, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WALKER, H. J. (1995). Theseus and Athens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ZAJONZ, S. (2002). Isokrates' enkomion auf Helena. Ein kommentar, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
