Ontological Dualism and Gnoseological Monism in the Regulae ad directionem ingenii of R. Descartes

Authors

  • Rodolfo Leiva Universidad de Ciencias Empresariales y Sociales. Universidad Nacional de Rosario.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.43.2019.21942

Keywords:

Descartes, Regulae ad directionem ingenii, ontological dualism, gnoseological monism, subjective turn.

Abstract

In this paper we will analyze how a first moment of the Cartesian subjective turn occurs based on the need to give a unitary (ie, monist) response on the level of knowledge to an irreducibly dualistic ontological reality; that is, how to conceive a gnoseological monism based on an ontological dualism. To this end, we will analyze how Descartes’ mathesis universalis expresses the original project of the Regulae and establishes the general conditions for its interpretation. Then, we will see how this mathesis, understood as an epistemic requirement has as a gnoseological correlate, a psychology in which perception and the cognitive faculty make up an integral mechanism that can be ontologically distinguished in body/mind. Finally, we will analyze how this ontological dualism conceals a true gnoseological monism in which all reality is reduced to a cognitive dimension in which corporality takes on the role of "ideal corporality".

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rodolfo Leiva, Universidad de Ciencias Empresariales y Sociales. Universidad Nacional de Rosario.

Docente Titular de Fundamentos de Filosofía, Facultad de Psicología y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Ciencias Empresariales y Sociales. Investigador en el Departamento de Investigación de la Universidad de Ciencias Empresariales y Sociales. Paraguay 1338, 1º Piso, Oficina 302, CABA, Argentina.

References

ADAM, Charles y TANNERY, Paul (1897-1913). Œuvres de Descartes, 12 vols. Paris: Léopold Cerf.

COTTINGHAM, John (1995). Descartes, trad. Laura Benítez, Zuraya Monroy Nasr, Leticia Rocha Herrera, Myriam Rudoy Callejas. México: UNAM.

DESCARTES, Rene. (1996). Reglas para la dirección del espíritu, trad. Juan Manuel Navarro Cordón. Madrid: Editorial Alianza S.A.

— (1966). Regulae ad directionen ingenii. Texte critique établi par Giovanni Crapulli avec la version hollandaise du XVIIième siècle. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff.

— (1977). Règles utiles et claires pour la direction de l'esprit en la recherche de la vérité, traduction selon le lexique cartésien, et annotation conceptuelle par Jean-Luc Marion, avec des notes mathématiques de Pierre Costabel. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff.

FOSTER, John (1991). The Immaterial Self: A Defence of the Cartesian Dualist Conception of the Mind. London & New York. Routledge.

GAUKROGER, Stephen (2002). Descartes, an intellectual biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

HAMELÍN, Octave (1949). El sistema de Descartes. Bs. As.: Editorial Losada S.A.

ITARD, Jean (1972). Del algebra simbólica al cálculo infinitesimal, en

TATON, Rene (comp.), VV.AA., Historia General de las Ciencias, 3 Vols., Barcelona: Ediciones Destino.

MARION, Jean-Luc (2008). Sobre la ontología gris de Descartes, trad. Alejandro García Mayo. Madrid: Escolar y Mayo Editores S.L.

ORTEGA Y GASSET, José. (1946–1983). Obras Completas, 12 vols. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.

SEPPER, Dennis (1996). Descartes's Imagination, Proportion, Images, and the Activity of Thinking. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

WEBER, Jean-Paul (1964). «Sur la composition de la Regulae IV de Descartes» en, Revue philosophique de la France et de l’etranger nº 154, 1964, pp. 1-20.

Published

2019-06-29

How to Cite

Leiva, R. (2019). Ontological Dualism and Gnoseological Monism in the Regulae ad directionem ingenii of R. Descartes. ENDOXA, (43), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.43.2019.21942

Issue

Section

Papers and Texts

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.