The Letter as Abstraction, Knowledge and Disagreement. The Case of Leibniz
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.38.2016.17158Keywords:
Letter, correspondence, Leibniz, Newton, knowledge, misunderstandingAbstract
Correspondence between intellectuals of different disciplines occupied a very important place in philosophical production between the 16th and 18th centuries. The lack of scientific journals, publishers and email, made postal mail (at the speed possible at that time) one of the key factors for exchanging knowledge, discussion and discovering new findings. In this paper a reflection on the relevance of the letter in the construction of knowledge is presented. Three main features stand out. First, the isolated letter is an abstraction regarding its own context, the set of correspondence between two or more authors. Second, the letter is a fundamental product, not only for disseminating knowledge among specialists, but also for its discovery and creation. Finally, the exchange of letters is not only an essential means of communication between scientists, politicians and intellectuals, but has also sometimes been the platform where confrontations of historical significance have taken place. All these reflections are illustrated through texts and examples from the vast correspondence of Leibniz.
Downloads
References
- LEIBNIZ, G.W. (2011), Obras filosóficas y científicas, trad. B. Orio de Miguel, vols. 17A y 17B: Correspondencia III, ed. Comares, Granada.
- LEIBNIZ, G.W. (2016), Obras filosóficas y científicas, trad. E. Rada, vol. 18: Correspondencia V, ed. Comares, Granada.
- CUBELLS, M.R. (en prensa), “La correspondencia de Leibniz en el conjunto de la obra leibniziana“ en J.A. Nicolás, M. Mendonça (eds.), Guía Comares de Leibniz (Monadología), ed. Comares, Granada.
- GÄDEKE, N. (2009), “Leibniz lässt sich informieren. Asymmetrien in seinen Korrespondenzbeziehungen”, en K.D. Herbst, S. Kratochwil (Hrsg.), Kommunikation in der frühen Neuzeit, P. Lang Verlag, Frankfurt a.M., 25-46.
- GUILLÉN VERA, T. (1990), “Los Nuevos Ensayos. Ensayo de un diálogo pretendido”, Azafea, 3, 63-86.
- TATON, R. (1976), “Le rôle et l’importance des correspondences scientifiques aux XVIIe et XVIII siècles”, Revue de Synthèse, 81-82, 7-22.
- ÜTERMÖEHLEN, G. (1976) “La correspondence de Leibniz et son édition dans les ‘Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe’”, Revue de Synthèse, 81-82, 95-106.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal must agree to the following terms:
- The authors hold author’s rights and guarantee the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows others to share the work as long as they acknowledge the authorship of the work and its initial publication in this journal.
- The authors can establish, on their own, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), always acknowledging the initial publication in this journal.
- The authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own webpages) before and during the submission process, as this can give rise to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and increased citing of the works published (See The Effect of Open Access).