The Law of Nature as an Abstract Universal. A Study of John . Locke’s Moral Principles in Light of His Critique of Idea of . Substance

Authors

  • Joan Severo Chumbita Doctorando en Filosofía (Universidad de Buenos Aires); Ayudante de primera en la cátedra de ética de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras (Universidad de Buenos Aires), Becario doctoral del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (Conicet).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.36.2015.14566

Keywords:

Locke - Law of Nature - Nominal essence - Idea of substance - idea of God.

Agencies:

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)

Abstract

This paper proposes to study the law of nature in light of Locke´s critique of the idea of substance. To this end, the first thing which will be accounted for is the displacement in Locke’s work regarding what is meant by the demonstration of the content of the law of nature, as well as the type of proof required. In second place, all the different contents of the law of nature that appear in the Lockean corpus will be taken into account: the ten commandments, loving your neighbour as yourself, the principle of self-preservation of the human race, the prohibition stockpiling fruit and leaving it to spoil, the duty of charity, of working the land and of leaving property to children. In third place, the paper will consider whether this plurality of formulations withstands the critique which Locke himself makes of the idea of substance as a nominal essence, that is, as a vague and imperfect generic definition that lacks the simple ideas that would sustain it. Finally, this internal critique of the Lockean concept of the law of nature will be distinguished from the external critique made by other interpreters in terms of inconsistency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Joan Severo Chumbita, Doctorando en Filosofía (Universidad de Buenos Aires); Ayudante de primera en la cátedra de ética de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras (Universidad de Buenos Aires), Becario doctoral del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (Conicet).

Licenciado y doctorando en Filosofía (Universidad de Buenos Aires); Ayudante de primera en la cátedra de ética de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras (Universidad de Buenos Aires), Becario doctoral del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (Conicet).

References

Primaria

LOCKE, J. (1824). Works of John Locke in Nine Volumes. London: Rivington.

--------------- (1965). Essays on the law of nature. The Latin text with a translation, introduction and notes, together with transcripts of Locke's shorthand in his journal of 1676. Ed. W. Von Leyden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

--------------- (1967). Two Tracts on Government. Tr. Philip Abrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

--------------- (1977). La racionalidad del cristianismo. Tr. Leandro González Puertas. Madrid: Ediciones Paulinas.

--------------- (1990). Segundo Tratado sobre el Gobierno Civil. Un ensayo acerca del verdadero origen, alcance y fin del Gobierno Civil. Tr. Carlos Mellizo. Madrid: Tecnos.

--------------- (1991). “Examen de la opinión del padre Malebranche de ver todas las cosas en Dios.” Obras varias y correspondencia de (y sobre) John Locke. Tr. José Antonio Robles y Carmen Silva. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana: 35-81.

--------------- (2002). Political Essays. Ed. Mark Goldie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

--------------- (2004). Two Treatises of Government. Tr. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

--------------- (2005). Ensayo sobre el entendimiento humano. Tr. Edmundo O'Gorman. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

--------------- (2007). La Ley de la Naturaleza. Tr. Carlos Mellizo. Madrid: Tecnos.

--------------- (2011). Ensayo sobre la tolerancia y otros escritos sobre ética y obediencia civil. Tr. RODRÍGUEZ LÓPEZ, B. y FERNÁNDEZ PEYCHAUX, D. A. Madrid: Minerva.

Secundaria

AARSLEFF, H. (1969). “The state of nature and the nature of man in Locke.” John Locke: Problems and Perspectives. Ed. YOLTON, J. W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 99-136.

ABDO FEREZ, C. (2013). “Hombría, colonialismo y castigo en John Locke”. Crimen y sí mismo. La conformación del individuo en la temprana modernidad occidental, Buenos Aires, Gorla: 335-451.

ASHCRAFT, R. (1968). “Locke's State of Nature. Historical fact or Moral Fiction?” The American Political Science Review 62.3: 898-915.

--------------- (1969). “Faith and knowledge in Locke's philosophy.” John Locke: Problems and Perspectives. Ed. YOLTON. J. W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 194-223.

AUTOR (2011)

-------------- (2013a)

-------------- (2013b)

-------------- (2014a)

-------------- (2014b)

-------------- (2015)

COX, R. (1960). Locke on War and Peace. London: Oxford University Press.

DUNN J. (1969). The political thought of John Locke. An historical account of the argument of the “Two Treatises of government”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

GAELA ESPERANZA, J. (2006). John Locke and the Natural Law. Yesterday and today: a critical analysis. Extracto de Tesis Doctoral. Facultad Eclesiástica de Filosofía. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.

GAROTTI, L. R. (1961). Locke e i suoi problemi, Urbino, Publicazioni dell’Università di Urbino.

GOUGH, J. W., John Locke's Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964.

HALL, R. D. (1981). John Locke and Natural Human Rights: an Inconsistency between his metaphysical/epistemological positions and his moral/political theories. Michigan: University Microfilms International.

HANCEY, J. O. (1976). “John Locke and the Law of Nature.” Political Theory 4: 439-454.

HOBBES, T. (1999). Leviatán. Tr. Carlos Mellizo. Buenos Aires: Alianza Editorial.

LENZ, J. W. (1956). “Locke's Essays on the Law of nature.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 17: 105-113.

LEYDEN, W. Von (1965). “Introduction”. Essays on the law of nature. The Latin text with a translation, introduction and notes, together with transcripts of Locke´s shorthand in his journal of 1676. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

SHAPIRO, B. (1968). “Latitudinarianism and Science in Seventeenth-Century England.” Past & Present, 40 (1968): 16-41.

SELIGER, M. (1963). “Locke's Natural Law and the Foundation of Politics.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 24 (1963): 337-354.

SIMMONS, A. J. (1992). The lockean theory of rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

SINGH, R. (1961). “John Locke and the Theory of Natural Law.” Political Studies 9: 105-118.

STRAUSS, L. (1958). “Critical Note: Locke´s Doctrine of Natural Law.” American Political science Review 52: 490-501.

-------------- (1992). Natural Right and History. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

UDI, J. (2012). “Propiedad lockeana, pobreza extrema y caridad”, Revista de Estudios Políticos 157: 165-188.

--------------- (2014). “El derecho a la caridad: repercusiones de la teología cristiana en la teoría de la propiedad de John Locke”, Revista de Filosofía 70: 149-160.

YOLTON, J. W. (1958). “Locke on the Law of Nature.” The philosophical Review 67: 477-498.

-------------- John Locke: and the way of ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.

WALDRON, J. (2002). God, Locke and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke´s Political Thougth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

-------------- (2005). “Response to Critics”, The Review of Politics, Vol. 67, N° 3 (Summer), 495-513.

Published

2015-12-18

How to Cite

Chumbita, J. S. (2015). The Law of Nature as an Abstract Universal. A Study of John . Locke’s Moral Principles in Light of His Critique of Idea of . Substance. ENDOXA, (36), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.36.2015.14566

Issue

Section

Papers and Texts