The debate about the presence of religious symbols in the public ceremonial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/eeii.vol.4.n.6.2017.18806Keywords:
protocol, ceremonial, institutional acts, communication, public imageAbstract
The debate about the use of religious symbols in the Spanish public ceremonial is not new. Since the Constitution of 1978, the non-denominational state has coined, the controversy over the presence of religious symbols in official acts, especially in the taking of public office, both at the State level and in the autonomous communities or local administrations, without a single guideline or a single criterion to follow.
Defenders and detractors argue, each with their reasons, both in the media and in the legislative chambers, pretending to legislate against the use of religious symbols and others in favor of their permanence.
The issue, which is not merely formal, is complex, since it involves religious feelings, political interests and historical and cultural traditions. All this in a convoluted sociopolitical context that does not lend itself to deliberate and thoughtful reflection.
With the intention of raising the debate from the analysis of the situation in which it is, we will approach it from different perspectives: the conceptual point of view, which will bring us closer to the true role of symbols in public ceremonial; The legal point of view, which will place us in the normative framework of application, and the comparative point of view, which will allow us to relativize when comparing the Spanish case with that of other countries in our geopolitical environment.
We will stick to the case of the taking of public office, which is sufficiently broad and representative of the current situation.
Downloads
References
REFERENCIAS
AMÉRIGO, F. & PELAYO, D. (2013). El uso de símbolos religiosos en el espacio público en el Estado laico español. Laboratorio de alternativas, volumen 179, pp. 1-76. Recuperado de http://www.fundacionalternativas.org/public/storage/laboratorio_documentos_archivos/b6e3c3b94b34d60f979259c0bfbcbab8.pdf
BLUMER, H. (1982). Interaccionismo simbólico. Perspectiva y método. Madrid, España: Hora
CASAL MACEIRAS, O. (2013). La construcción de la imagen pública del poder a través del protocolo y el ceremonial. Referencias históricas. Historia y Comunicación Social, volumen 18. Nº Esp. Octubre, pp. 761-775. Recuperado de http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HICS/article/view/44006/41611
ELVIRA PERALES, A. & GONZÁLEZ ESCUDERO, A. (2011). Constitución Española. Título 1. Derechos y deberes. Artículo 16. Sinopsis. Recuperado de http://www.congreso.es/consti/constitucion/indice/sinopsis/sinopsis.jsp?art=16&tipo=2
LÓPEZ-NIETO Y MALLO, F. (2006). Honores y protocolo (3ª ed.). Madrid, España: El Consultor de los Ayuntamientos.
PARDO LÓPEZ, M.M. (2008). Símbolos religiosos y deber de neutralidad estatal: el supuesto de los crucifijos en las aulas como excusa para aproximarse a la relación entre religión y estado. Anales del Derecho, nº 26, pp. 183-225. Recuperado de
http://revistas.um.es/analesderecho/article/view/113151/107221
RAMOS FERNÁNDEZ, F. (2010). Protocolo y sociedad laica. Protocolo y tradición frente sociedad laica y culturas visitantes. Datos para el conflicto. II Foro Hispano-Luso Iberoamericano De Protocolo Corporativo. Pontevedra, España, 19-20 mayo.
SANZ GONZÁLEZ, M. Á., & GONZÁLEZ LOBO, M. Á. (2005). Identidad corporativa. Claves de la comunicación empresarial. Madrid, España: ESIC.
WEBGRAFÍA
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. (2017). Estudio nº3170. Barómetro de marzo 2017. Madrid: CIS. Recuperado de http://datos.cis.es/pdf/Es3170rei_A.pdf
Constitución Española. (1978). Congreso. Recuperado de https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-1978-31229
Constitución de EE.UU. (1787). Recuperado de https://www.constitutionfacts.com/content/constitution/files/USConstitution_Spanish.pdf
Constituição da República Portuguesa (1976). Lisboa: Parlamento da República de Portugal. Recuperado de https://www.parlamento.pt/parlamento/documents/crp1976.pdf
Constitución de la República Francesa (1958). París: Senado. Recuperado de https://www.senat.fr/fileadmin/Fichiers/Images/lng/constitution-espagnol_juillet2008.pdf
Constitución de la República Helena. (1975). Atenas: Parlamento de la República Helena. Recuperado de http://www.hellenicparliament.gr/UserFiles/8c3e9046-78fb-48f4-bd82-bbba28ca1ef5/SYNTAGMA.pdf
Constitución Española. (1978). Madrid: Congreso. Recuperado de http://www.congreso.es/consti/constitucion/indice/titulos/articulos.jsp?ini=16&tipo=2
Ley orgánica 5/1985, de 19 de junio de régimen electoral general, (1985). BOE nº 147. Recuperado de https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-1985-11672
Real Academia Española [RAE]. (2017). Símbolo. Edición Tricentenario. Rae.es. Recuperado de http://dle.rae.es/?id=Xuq7wTS
- Jurar. Edición Tricentenario. Rae.es. Recuperado de http://dle.rae.es/?id=MdqgeJ8
- Prometer. Edición Tricentenario. Rae.es. Recuperado de http://dle.rae.es/?id=ULSmbRK
Real Decreto 707/1979, de 5 de abril, por el que se establece la fórmula de juramento en cargos y funciones públicas, (1979). BOE nº 183. Recuperado de https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-1979-9453
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Revista de Estudios Institucionales is distributed under a Creative Creative Commons Reconocimiento NoComercial NoDerivadas (by-nc-nd).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as well as licensed under a Share of work license, under conditions of authorship acknowledgment, for non-commercial purposes and without derivative works such as are specified in the license.
- Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of their initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their papers electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges as well as more citation. earliest and largest of published works (See The Effect of Open Access)