The relationships between Stress, Dark Triad personality and utilitarian Moral Judgment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.28948Agencies:
This work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, FCT Research Center Grant UID/BIM/04773/2013 CBMR 1334.Abstract
There is a growing evidence that stress affects cognitive and emotional processes underling decision making. However, according some authors, subclinical personality traits of the participants must be also considered in this relation between stress and moral decision. Our study examines whether stress affects moral decision-making according two different subclinical personalities. Forty undergraduate volunteers were previously distributed according their personality traits (Machiavellian; Narcissism and Normal) and randomly assigned to both conditions (stress vs. control). The stress induction was assessed with a self-reported questionnaire and with a measurement of heart rate. All participants performed a moral decision-making task in which every day moral dilemmas were described. The main results suggest that stress group made less utilitarian choices when compared to control group. Although machiavellian and narcissistic participants made more utilitarian decisions; the interaction between stress, personality and moral judgment did not reach significance. We conclude that stress induction predisposed participants to less utilitarian responses when faced to personal and impersonal moral dilemmas. We also suggested that subclinical personality (particularly narcissism) seems to be less permeable to stress; revealing the same moral utilitarian pattern in both experimental conditions.
Downloads
References
Al Ain, S., Carre, A., Fantini-Hauwel, C., Baudouin, J. Y., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). What is the emotional core of the multidimensional Machiavellian personality trait? Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00454
Arvan, M. (2013). Bad News for Conservatives? Moral Judgments and the Dark Triad Personality Traits: A Correlational Study. Neuroethics, 6(2), 307-318. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9140-6
Banich, M. T., Mackiewicz, K. L., Depue, B. E., Whitmer, A. J., Miller, G. A., & Heller, W. (2009). Cognitive control mechanisms, emotion and memory: A neural perspective with implications for psychopathology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(5), 613-630. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.010
Caviola, L., & Faber, N. S. (2014). How stress influences our morality. In-Mind, 23(10). Retrieved from http://www.in-mind.org/article/how-stress-influences-our-morality
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
Dedovic, K., D'Aguiar, C., & Pruessner, J. C. (2009). What Stress Does to Your Brain: A Review of Neuroimaging Studies. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie, 54(1), 6-15.
Djeriouat, H., & Trémolière, B. (2014). The Dark Triad of personality and utilitarian moral judgment: The mediating role of Honesty/Humility and Harm/Care. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 11 - 16. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.026
Friesdorf, R., Conway, P: & Gawronski, B. (2015). Gender Differences in Responses to Moral Dilemmas. A Process Dissociation Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(5), 696-713.
Galinha, I. C., & Ribeiro, J. L. P. (2005). Contribuição para o estudo da versão portuguesa da Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): II – Estudo psicométrico. In Análise Psicológica (Vol. 23, pp. 219-227).
Gleichgerrcht, E., Torralva, T., Roca, M., Pose, M., & Manes, F. (2011). The role of social cognition in moral judgment in frontotemporal dementia. Social Neuroscience, 6(2), 113-122. doi:10.1080/17470919.2010.506751
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389-400. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
Heiphetz, L., & Young, L. (2014). A social cognitive developmental perspective on moral judgment. Behaviour, 151(2/3), 315-335. doi:10.1163/1568539X-00003131
Jonason, P. K., & Krause, L. (2013). The emotional deficits associated with the Dark Triad traits: Cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 532-537. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.027
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond?: The Dark Triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8(2), 111-120.
Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The Trier Social Stress Test - A Tool For Investigating Psychobiological Stress Responses In A Laboratory Setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28(1-2), 76-81. doi:10.1159/000119004
Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature, 446(7138), 908-911. doi:10.1038/nature05631
Kudielka, B. M., Hellhammer, D. H., & Wust, S. (2009). Why do we respond so differently? Reviewing determinants of human salivary cortisol responses to challenge. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(1), 2-18. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.004
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping: Springer Publishing Company.
Limpo, T., Alves, R. A., & Castro, S. L. (2013). Medir a empatia: Adaptação portuguesa do Índice de Reactividade Interpessoal. Laboratório de Psicologia, 8(2), 171-184.
Martins, A., & Reis, A. (2007). Validação de estímulos para construção de paradigmas para o estudo do reconhecimento de emoções. Provas de Aptidão e Capacidade Científica pela Universidade do Algarve.
Miller, J.D., Lynam, D.R, Seidor, L., Crowe, M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Consensual lay profiles of narcissism and their connection to the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 30, 10-18. 189.
Noser, A. E., Zeigler-Hill, V., Vrabel, J. K., Besser, A., Ewing, T. D., & Southard, A. C. (2015). Dark and immoral: The links between pathological personality features and moral values. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 30-35.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
Pechorro, P., Caramelo, V., Oliveira, J. P., Nunes, C., Curtis, S. R. & Jones, D. N. (2018). The Short Dark Triad (SD3): Adaptation and Psychometrics among At-Risk Male and Female Youths. Deviant Behavior. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2017.1421120
Rosen, J. B., Rott, E., Ebersbach, G., & Kalbe, E. (2015). Altered moral decision-making in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 21(10), 1191 - 1199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.08.016
Silva, D. (2003). O Inventário de Estado-Traço de Ansiedade (STAI). In M. M. Gonçalves, M. R. Simões, L. S. Almeida, & C. Machado (Eds.), Avaliação Psicológica – Instrumentos Validados para a População Portuguesa (pp. 45-63). Coimbra: Quarteto Editora.
Singer, N., Sommer, M., Döhnel, K., Zänkert, S., Wüst, S., & Kudielka, B. M. (2017). Acute psychosocial stress and everyday moral decision-making in young healthy men: The impact of cortisol. Hormones and behavior, 93, 72-81.
Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & LeBreton, J. M. (2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of organizational behavior, 35(S1).
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R. E., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1977). Stait-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults. Redwood City: Mind Garden.
Starcke, K., Ludwig, A.-C., & Brand, M. (2012). Anticipatory stress interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(1), 61-68.
Vize, C., Lynam, D. R., Collison, K., & Miller, J. D. (2018). Differences among dark triad components: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 101-111.
Vize, C., Lynam, D. R., Collison, K., & Miller, J. D. (2018). Differences among dark triad components: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 101-111.
Vonk, J., Zeigler-Hill, V., Ewing, D., Mercer, S., & Noser, A. E. (2015). Mindreading in the dark: Dark personality features and theory of mind. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 50-54. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.025
Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(7), 794-799. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008
Warton, D. I. & Hui, F. K. C. (2011). The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of propostions in ecology. Ecology, 92(1), 3-10.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063.
Youssef, F. F., Dookeeram, K., Basdeo, V., Francis, E., Doman, M., Mamed, D., . . . Legall, G. (2012). Stress alters personal moral decision making. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(4), 491-498. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.017
Yu, R. (2016). Stress potentiates decision biases: A stress induced deliberation-to-intuition (SIDI) model. Neurobiology of stress, 3, 83-95.
Zeigler-Hill, V., Noser, A. E., Roof, C., Vonk, J., & Marcus, D. K. (2015). Spitefulness and moral values. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 86-90. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.050
Zeigler-Hill, V., & Vonk, J. (2015). Dark Personality Features and Emotion Dysregulation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34(8), 692-704.
