The improper omission in crimes of administrative prevarication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/rduned.16.2015.15279Keywords:
prevarication, improper omission, prevaricating result, alleged administrative decision, administrative silenceAbstract
Considering the typical description of transgression contained in the Penal Code in which the verb “to dictate” a resolution refers to an active behavior, it is understandable that, at the doctrinal level, the acceptance of a omissive prevarication has been a controversial issue. In this article, in addition to accepting such criminal activity, we will try to confront and solve the problems arising from the admission of omissive prevarication, but conditioned to concurrence with an alleged administrative decision, appearing in legal matters according to the rules of administrative silence. This conditioning is seen in some Supreme Court judgments and, in some way, in some doctrinal opinions to which we shall refer.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Las obras están bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que:
- Se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra).
- No se usen para fines comerciales.
- Se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
