The Technopolitics of Mapping Dar es Salaam: An examination of the technological and political motivations of the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team

La tecnopolítica de la cartografía de Dar es Salaam: Un examen de las motivaciones tecnológicas y políticas del equipo humanitario OpenStreetMap

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/etfvi.14.2021.30644

Palabras clave:

Mapeo participativo; desarrollo internacional; OpenStreetMap; Dar es Salaam

Resumen

La creación de mapas ha sido durante mucho tiempo una parte fundamental del trabajo de desarrollo, desde el registro de encuestas de los hogares, los ejercicios de cartografía participativa hasta proyectos de Valoración Rural Participativa (VRP). Ahora el sector está lleno de nuevos actores – empresas de cartografía y tecnología. así como Organizaciones No Gubernamentales, que realizan el seguimiento mediante drones e imágenes de satélite, junto con el empleo de métodos más tradicionales. Muchos de estos nuevos actores nacieron de ONGs y compañías que se iniciaron como ‘cartógrafos de crisis’. Los proyectos de ‘cartografía de crisis’ a corto plazo se han convertido en una parte habitual de la respuesta humanitaria tras una catástrofe. La naturaleza a corto plazo de estas acciones, y la necesidad de obtener un empleo o beneficios estables, ha llevado a una tendencia creciente para que las mismas organizaciones y empresas permanezcan sobre el terreno elaborando mapas o se desplacen a otras zonas como parte de una práctica cartográfica preventiva, insertándose en el ecosistema más amplio del desarrollo internacional. Esta investigación, centrada en Tanzania, examina como HOTOSM ha intentado hacer un giro para trabajar como una organización de desarrollo que crea mapas para la prevención de crisis, pero también resultados socio-económicos más amplios. La investigación utilizó entrevistas para explorar la interacción entre la tecnología y la micro/macro política en torno a la cartografía de Dar es Salaam. Se examinó como HOTOSM desempeña su papel, y como se posiciona en la elaboración de mapas en el contexto de Dar es Salaam. Los hallazgos sugieren que HOTOSM sigue estando poco desarrollada como organización y carece de la madurez necesaria para crear verdaderos modelos de trabajo participativos.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Adams, P.C. & Jansson, A. (2012). Communication geography: a bridge between disciplines. Communication Theory, 22, 299-318.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01406.x

Adinani, H. (2018). Newly-revealed Shina boundaries offer unprecedented hyperlocal data for decisionmakers. Medium. Available from:

https://medium.com/data-zetu/newly-revealed-shina-boundaries-offer-unprecedented-hyperlocal-data-for-decisionmakers-91a2bce04a3e

Brovelli, M., Ilie, C. M., & Coetzee, S. (2019). Openness and community geospatial science for monitoring SDGs—an example from Tanzania. Sustainable Development Goals Connectivity Dilemma: Land and Geospatial Information for Urban and Rural Resilience, 313-324.

https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429290626-20

Bryan, J. (2011). Walking the line: participatory mapping, indigenous rights, and neoliberalism. Geoforum, 42 (1), 40-50.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.09.001

Shum, S. B., Aberer, K., Schmidt, A., Bishop, S., Lukowicz, P., Anderson, S., ... & Helbing, D. (2012). Towards a global participatory platform: democratising open data, complexity science and collective intelligence. European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214 (1), 109-152.

https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01690-3

Burns, R. (2019). New frontiers of philanthro‐capitalism: Digital technologies and humanitarianism. Antipode, 51(4), 1101-1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12534

Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots: a cross-cultural theory of urban social movements (No. 7). University of California Press.

Chambers, R., Howes, M., Belsaha, D., Richards, D., Swift, J., & O’Keefe, L. (1979). Rural development: whose knowledge counts. IDS Bulletin, 10(2).

Collier, D. (2016). Repainting the Walls of Lunda: Information Colonialism and Angolan Art. University of Minnesota Press.

https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816694440.001.0001

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20 (4), 336-349.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632

Crawford, K. (2013). The hidden biases in big data. Harvard Law Review, 1

Crooks, A.T. & Wise, S. (2013). GIS and agent-based models for humanitarian assistance. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 41, 100-111.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.05.003

Digital Globe (n.d.). Transforming Our World: Geospatial Information – Key to Achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Geospatial Media and Communications.

Edney, M.H. (2019). Cartography: the ideal and its history. University of Chicago Press.

https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226605715.001.0001

Edwards, D. (2015). Is tech-enabled citizen-engagement a game changer for development. Hivos People Unlimited, 20 March.

https://knowledge.hivos.org/tech-enabled-citizen-engagement-game-changer-development

Elwood, S. & Leszczynski, A. (2013). New spatial media, new knowledge politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38 (4), 544-559.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00543.x

Escobar, A. (1992). Imagining a post-development era: critical thought, development and social movements. Social Text, 31/32, 20-56.

https://doi.org/10.2307/466217

Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press.

Fonte, C. C., Minghini, M., Patriarca, J., Antoniou, V., See, L., & Skopeliti, A. (2017). Generating up-to-date and detailed land use and land cover maps using OpenStreetMap and GlobeLand30. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(4), 125.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6040125

Gopal, S., Sarkar, R., Banda, K., Govindarajan, J., Harijan, B. B., Jeyakumar, M. B., ... & Balraj, V (2009). Study of water supply & sanitation practices in India using geographic information systems: some design & other considerations in a village setting. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 129 (3), 233-241.

Graham, M. (2013). Geography/internet: ethereal alternate dimensions of cyberspace or grounded augmented realities. The Geographical Journal, 179 (2), 177-182.

https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12009

Haklay, M., Singleton, A. & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the

GeoWeb. Geography Compass, 2 (6), 2011-2039.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00167.x

Harley, J.B. (1988). Silences and secrecy: the hidden agenda of cartography in early modern Europe. Imago mundi, 40(1), 57-76.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03085698808592639

Hart, G. (2001). Development critiques in the 1990s: culs de sac and promising paths. Progress in Human Geography, 25 (4), 649-658.

https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201682689002

HOT. (2018). Annual Report.

https://www.hotosm.org/downloads/2018-Annual-Report.pdf

HOT. (2020). What we do. Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team.

https://www.hotosm.org/what-we-do

Hunt, A., & Specht, D. (2019). Crowdsourced mapping in crisis zones: collaboration, organisation and impact. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 4(1), 1-11.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-018-0048-1

Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35 (2), 441-456.

https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219

Jordan, T. (2015). Information politics: liberation and exploitation in the digital society. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183p2xf

Kennedy, H., Hill, R. L., Aiello, G., & Allen, W. (2016). The work that visualisation conventions do. Information, Communication & Society, 19 (6), 715-735.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153126

Kidd, J. (2016). Representation. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666785

Kim K. (1998). Using GIS technologies to empower community based organizations in Hawaii. Position paper presented at the Project Varenius Specialist Meeting: Empowerment, marginalization, and public participation GIS, Santa Barbara, CA.

Kitchin, R., Perkins, C.& Dodge, M. (2009). Thinking about maps. Rethinking Maps: New Frontiers in Cartographic Theory, 1-25.

Kleine, D., Hollow, D., & Poveda Villalba, S. C. (2014). Children, ICTs and development: capturing the potential, meeting the challenges.

Kyem, P.A.K. (2001). Public participation GIS applications and the community empowerment process: A review of concerns and challenges (published 2004). Cartographica, 38 (3&4), 5–17.

https://doi.org/10.3138/2J31-4648-6P62-6P78

Lee, P.G. & Global Forest Watch Canada. (2003). Canada’s large intact forest landscapes. Global Forest Watch Canada.

Mesmar, S. , Talhouk, R., Akik, C., Olivier, P., Elhajj, I. H., Elbassuoni, S., ... & Ghattas, H. (2016). The impact of digital technology on health of populations affected by humanitarian crises: recent innovations and current gaps. Journal of Public Health Policy, 37 (2), 167-200.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-016-0040-1

Mohan, G. (2002). The disappointments of civil society: the politics of NGO intervention in Northern Ghana. Political Geography, 21,125-54.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00072-5

Moore, R., Bhide, N., & Verity, A. (2016). Humanitarian information management failures: survey report. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Geneva.

Mosse, D. (2001). People’s knowledge’, participation and patronage: Operations and representations in rural development. Participation: The New Tyranny, 16-35.

O’Hara, K. (2004). Ontologies and technologies: knowledge representation or misrepresentation. ACM SIGIR Forum, 38, (2), 11-17.

https://doi.org/10.1145/1041394.1041397

Paglen, T. (2008). Mapping Ghosts. In: Mogel, L. and Bhagat, A. (eds.) An atlas of radical cartography. Los Angeles: Journal of Aesthetics and Protest Press, 39-50

Parker, B. (2006). Constructing community through maps? Power and praxis in community

mapping. The Professional Geographer, 58 (4), 470-484.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00583.x

Popping R., & Roberts C.W. (1997). Network Approaches in Text Analysis. In Klar R., Opitz O. (eds) Classification and Knowledge Organization. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59051-1_40

Potts, J. (2015). The new time and space. Palgrave Macmillan.

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137494382

Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21 (2-3), 168-178.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353

Radford, T. (2019) Community Q&A: Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team. Interview conducted by Wood, E. for Centre for HumData. Available from:

https://reliefweb.int/report/world/community-qa-humanitarian-openstreetmap-team [Accessed 30 January 2020]

Radil, S.M. & Jiao, J. (2016). Public participatory GIS and the geography of inclusion. The Professional Geographer, 68 (2), 202-210.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2015.1054750

Rekha, B. (2016). Geospatial data: key to achieve SDGs. Geospatial World. Available from :

https://www.geospatialworld.net/article/geospatial-data-sustainable-development-goals [Accessed 1 May 2017]

Said, E. W. (1985). Orientalism reconsidered. Race & class, 27(2), 1-15.

https://doi.org/10.1177/030639688502700201

Scott, G. & Rajabifard, A. (2015). Integrating geospatial information into the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. In: Twentieth United Nations Regional Cartographic Conference for Asia and the Pacific. Jeju, Korea. 6 – 9 October 2015

Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (3), 491-507.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x

Sletto, B.I. (2009). Indigenous people don’t have boundaries: reborderings, fire management, and productions of authenticities in indigenous landscapes. Cultural Geographies, 16 (2), 253-277.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474008101519

Specht, D. & Feigenbaum, A. (2018). From cartographic gaze to contestatory cartographies. In: Pol Bargués-Pedreny, P., Chandler, D. and Simon, E. (eds.) Mapping and politics in the digital age. Routledge Global Cooperation Series, 39-55.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351124485-3

Verplanke, J., McCall, M. K., Uberhuaga, C., Rambaldi, G., & Haklay, M. (2016). A shared perspective for PGIS and VGI. The Cartographic Journal, 53 (4), 308-317.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2016.1227552

Wainwright, J. & Bryan, J. (2009). Cartography, territory, property: postcolonial reflections on indigenous counter-mapping in Nicaragua and Belize. Cultural Geographies, 16 (2), 153-178.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474008101515

Descargas

Publicado

2021-11-17

Cómo citar

Specht, D. (2021). The Technopolitics of Mapping Dar es Salaam: An examination of the technological and political motivations of the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team: La tecnopolítica de la cartografía de Dar es Salaam: Un examen de las motivaciones tecnológicas y políticas del equipo humanitario OpenStreetMap. Espacio Tiempo y Forma. Serie VI, Geografía, (14), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.5944/etfvi.14.2021.30644

Número

Sección

Artículos