The defendant’s lie: A right or a sanctionable conduct?

Authors

  • José María Asencio Gallego Juez. Doctor en Derecho. Ex-Letrado del Consejo General del Poder Judicial. Profesor de Derecho Penal de la Universidad de Barcelona. Profesor de Derecho Procesal de la Universidad Abat Oliba CEU de Barcelona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/rduned.30.2022.36853

Keywords:

right not to testify against oneself and not to confess guilty, right to lie, right to remain silent, alibi in criminal proceedings

Abstract

The accused, as a passive party in criminal proceedings, is the holder of the right of defence recognised in Article 24 of the Spanish Constitution. This, in turn, encompasses other rights, including, for its importance, the right to remain silent and the right not to testify against oneself and not to confess guilty. These are therefore two different rights, the exercise of which by the defendant entails different conducts. Moreover, the first of them, since its enshrinement, has generated a doctrinal and jurisprudential debate that, over the years, continues unresolved. The question is whether the accused in criminal proceedings has the right to lie or, on the contrary, from his or her mendacious statement can lead to harmful consequences for him in the proceedings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-02-09

How to Cite

Asencio Gallego, J. M. . (2023). The defendant’s lie: A right or a sanctionable conduct?. Revista de Derecho de la UNED (RDUNED), (30), 377–402. https://doi.org/10.5944/rduned.30.2022.36853

Issue

Section

Sección abierta

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.