Alternatives to the trial on the criminal liability of legal entities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/rduned.27.2021.31070Keywords:
corporate, Prosecutor office, divert of the trial, margin of appreciation, judiciary supervisionAbstract
Ten years ago, criminal liability of the legal entities was introduced in our country as the most relevant innovation that our criminal dogmatics have undergone for centuries. Practical issues of shortage in human and material resources for entering into the labyrinth of complex corporations and for gathering substantial evidence are added to the conceptual problems that involve investigating entities, which have no human brain and which cannot be convicted to imprisonment. Spain starts from a disadvantage for not having yet introduced in its legal system resources allowing the Prosecutor to waive charges if the requirements of the payment of a fine or of the compromise of adopting internal measures within the company to prevent criminal reiteration are fulfilled. The aim of the present paper is to study the different alternatives to the judgment followed in other countries and to encourage a debate about the viability of a criminal self-report within the companies and the participation of Spain in joint international investigations.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.