Governance of the Spanish dual vocational training: between the lack of coordination and the lack of objectives

Pablo Sanz de Miguel

Abstract


Spain is currently developing a dual Vocational Education Training (VET), which is represented as an attractive political option to improve the transition of young people into the employment system and adapt their competences to the employers’ demands. In this context, attention should be drawn to the issue of its governance structures. Governance structures ensure the efficiency and success of dual VET systems that require the coordination of activities of collective actors and the closer involvement of some agents such as companies. This article provides some analytical dimensions to understand and classify dual VET systems. Then it analyses through these dimensions the emergent dual VET system of Spain, which is compared with the cases of Denmark and Germany. It is, however, an asymmetric comparison, because Denmark and Germany are used as contrasting cases with the Spanish case, which is analysed more extensively through a normative analysis and a filed work based on focus groups. The article shows that there is room for improvement for the emerging Spanish dual vocational training system. It would require a more coherent and consistent legal framework, a substantial improvement in terms of coordination of the different administrations and actors involved, a reinforced role of employees’ representatives and more precise definition of goals to be attained.

Keywords


dual vocational training; governance; Spain; legal framework consistency; participation; agency rationality

References


BUSEMEYER, M.R. Y TRAMPUSCH, C. (2012): The political economy of collective skill formation. (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

CLEMATIDE, B., DAHL, A., VIND, A. Y JØRGENSEN, C. H. (2005): Challenges for the Danish VET system – on the path towards a future model. Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik.

DEISSINGER, T. Y GONON, P. (2016): Stakeholders in the German and Swiss vocational educational and training system: Their role in innovating apprenticeships against the background of academisation, Education + Training, 58 (6), pp.568-577.

EICHHORST, W., RODRÍGUEZ-PLANAS, N., SCHMIDL, R. Y ZIMMERMANN, K. F. (2012): A Roadmap to Vocational Education and Training Systems Around the World, IZA, Discussion Paper Series (http://ftp.iza.org/dp7110.pdf)

FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING (BIBB) (2011): Vocational Training Regulations and the Process Behind Them (Bonn: BIBB Press).

GARCÍA, M., CASAL, J., MERINO, R. Y SÁNCHEZ, A. (2013): Itinerarios de Abandono Escolar y Transiciones tras la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria, Revista de Educación, mayo-agosto, pp. 65-94.

GREINERT, W-D. (2004): Los sistemas europeos de formación profesional: algunas reflexiones sobre el contexto teórico de su evolución histórica, Revista de Formación Profesional, 32, pp. 18-27.

HELMS, C. (2013): The role and meaning of vocations in the transition from education to work, International Journal of Training Research 11(2), pp. 166–183.

HIPPACH SCHNEIDER, U. Y HUISMANN, A. (2016). Vocational education and training in Europe – Germany. CEDEFOP ReferNet VET in Europe reports (http://libserver.cedefop.europa.eu/vetelib/2016/2016_CR_DE.pdf=)

HOMS, O. (2008): La formació professional a Espanya. Cap a la societat del coneixement. (Barcelona: Obra Social Fundació La Caixa).

HOOGHE L. Y MARKS G. (2001): Multi-level Governance and European Integration (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield).

JACOB, M. Y SOLGA, H. (2015): Germany’s Vocational Education and Training System in Transformation: Changes in the Participation of Low- and High-Achieving Youth Over Time, European Sociological Review, 31(2): 161–171.

JUUL, I. Y HELMS, C. (2011): Challenges for the dual system and occupational self-governance in Denmark, Journal of Vocational Education & Training 63(3), pp. 289-303.

LOPE, A. Y ALÓS, R. (2013): Las políticas activas de empleo en España: deficientes políticas para malos empleos, Sociología del Trabajo, 77, pp. 92-116.

MARGINSON, P. Y KEUNE, P. (2012): European social dialogue as multi level governance: Towards more autonomy and new dependencies, in Barbier, J.C- (ed) EU Law, Governance and Social Policy European Integration online Papers (EIoP),Special Mini Issue 1, Vol. 16.

MARGINSON P. Y SISSON, K. (2004): European Integration and Industrial Relations (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

MARHUENDA, F. (2012): La Formación Profesional (Madrid: Síntesis).

MARISCAL, N. (2003): Teorías políticas de la integración europea (Madrid: Tecnos).

MAYNTZ, R. (2006): Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie?, en Schuppert, G.F. (ed.), Governance-Forschung: Vergewisserung über Stand und Entwicklungslinien, pp. 11-20 (Baden-Baden: Nomos).

MENA, A.M. Y MÉNDEZ, J.M. (2009): La técnica del grupo de discusión en investigación cualitativa, Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 49(3).

MERINO, R. (2009): El sistema de formación profesional en España: tendencias y debates, en Gairín, J., Essomba, M.A. y Muntané, D. (eds.): La calidad de la Formación Profesional en Europa, hoy, pp. 131-168 (Bizkaia: Wolters Kluwer).

MERINO, R., GARCÍA, M., CASAL, J. Y SÁNCHEZ, A. (2011): Itinerarios formativos y laborales de los jóvenes graduados en formación profesional. Sobre algunos prejuicios en la formación profesional, Sociología del Trabajo, 72, pp. 137-156.

OLIVER, D. (2010): Complexity in Vocational Education and Training Governance, Research in Comparative and International Education, 5 (3), pp. 261-273.

PLANAS, J. (2012): ¿Qué es y para qué sirve hoy la formación profesional? De la VT (Formación Profesional) a la VET (Formación y Educación Profesional), Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación, 5(1), pp.5-15.

RAUNER, F. Y SMITH, E. (2010): Rediscovering Apprenticeship (Dordrecth: Springer).

RAUNER, F. Y WITTING, W. (2010): Differences in the Organisation of Apprenticeship in Europe: findings of a comparative evaluation study, Research in Comparative and International Education, 5, (3), pp. 237-250.

RAUNER, F., WITTING, W. Y DEIMER, L. (2010): Plural Administration in Dual Systems in selected European countries. In Rauner, F.; Smith, E. (eds.): Rediscovering Apprenticeship, pp. 31-43 (Dordrecth: Springer).

ROLLS, S. (2012): Denmark. VET in Europe-Country report. REFERNET. CEDEFOP. (http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/country-reports/denmark-vet-europe-country-report-2012)

SALA, G., PLANAS, J. Y VAN ROMPAEY, E. (2010): Especialidad de formación, especialidad de empleo y resultados de inserción. ¿Trabajan los jóvenes donde deberían?, Sociología del Trabajo, 70, pp. 87-106.

SOLGA, H., PROTSCH, P., EBNER, C. Y BRZINSKY-FAY, C. (2014): The German vocational education and training system: Its institutional configuration, strengths and challenges. Discussion Paper SP I 2014–502 October 2014. WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

SPICER, M. (2004): Public administration, the history of ideas, and the reinventing government movement, Public Administration Review, 64 (3), pp. 353-362.

WIBORG, S. Y CORT, P. (2010): The Vocational Education and Training System in Denmark: Continuity and Change, en Gerhard Bosch and Jean Charest (eds.), Vocational Training: international perspectives, pp.84-109 (New York: Routledge).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.30.2017.18705

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Española de Educación Comparada

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

  

Revista Española de Educación Comparada (REEC)

Faculty of Education. UNED. 
c/ Juan del Rosal, 14
28040 - MADRID (Spain) 
Phone number: +34 654 73 1122
E-mail: reec@edu.uned.es

 

 



ISSN (printed version): 1137-8654
ISSN (electronic version): 2174-5382
Legal Deposit: M.38499-1995